Regal Trading Cards Signing Information

I don't think they were necessarily signed in numerical order given he started doing G.Langlands for 6 cards and they aren't numbered 1-6, so really could of been anywhere from 7th to 25th

I thought Regal posted on here that cards 1-6 were all signed with the initial.
 
I stand corrected, quote from the Regal post ;

"We can confirm that Graeme started out signing G Langlands and then changed to the full signature. He signed 6 cards only with G Langlands and the rest with Graeme Langlands.

Regal Trading Cards - For the Collector."
 
I feel for Richard as he misses out on a card that he was keen to have in his collection, I would have been put out if it had happened to me. But.. well done to Regal and Footycards for helping a collector out.

On Regal I thought the overall experience was positive and I look forward to future product. On the positive;

1. Regal produced a quality product and secured high end signatures for a decent price
2. The build up to the release raised interest and kept us intrigued.
3. Regal engaged the consumer directly and continues participate with us even if selective.

4. They are monitoring our feedback here and other social media. Showe they are interested in what we think, willing to learn and adapt and looking to a longer presence in this market. I welcome this rather than having one player market.
5. Packaging and delivery method was better than I expected and delivery was included in price advertised.
6. Low number release and available to collectors first and not allowing multiple purchases gave us all a chance

On the negative ;

1. maybe withheld details although I get they had a marketing plan and they executed on it. Not a concern for me personally

2. Payment options caused some collectors to miss out. Could have cost one of us the #1 cards. I know my transaction was delayed cause I had to reprocess my transaction as I had to rethink whether I wanted to use credit or DD. Would have been useful to know options upfront either in Regal's communication or in Tradingcards site prior to checkout.

3. Number allocation policy disclosure. Obviously collectors want the best chance or at least be informed.

On the Langlands signature and in particular the one Richard received, yeh I would have initially been bummed if I received it. I would have gone through the same thought process and disappointment. But taking a step back I guess a guarantee from Regal or the legend may have been sufficient for me but in writing so if I wanted one day to sell I would have a chance on ROI. Also the card shows some character and an indication of the his growing frailty. I would also like to see what #23 and #25 sigs look like. When all is said and done #23,#24,#25/25 could be the most valuable cards if they end up being the last official cards he signs. Please take my last comment as a what/if scenario only, I wish our legend the best of health for many years to come.

All in all a good product with great legends at a reasonable price to collectors. I am sorry to have a good OZCT collector miss out but money back is reasonable if no replacement option was available.

I look forward to more high end cards and hope Richard gets in first on the next release.

Thanks mate, appreciate your concern, while disappointed, i can acknowledge probably better to have it happen to me (not a dragons fan) then some other ppl who are,as they would likely be alot more upset knowing they might not get another one or have to pay alot to convince another to part with theirs. I know I would of been more frustrated if it was a bulldogs card and may of been forced to keep it out of fear of missing out on another chance.

I do wonder if it will sell at full price now. If it ends up being reduced I would appreciate being offered first option to buy it,( as it isn't a terrible card but I don't think it is worth the full value ) although that might be wishful thinking.

Regal seem to be listening so hopefully this won't be an issue in future and there is a replacement option.
 
I feel for Richard as he misses out on a card that he was keen to have in his collection, I would have been put out if it had happened to me. But.. well done to Regal and Footycards for helping a collector out.

On Regal I thought the overall experience was positive and I look forward to future product. On the positive;

1. Regal produced a quality product and secured high end signatures for a decent price
2. The build up to the release raised interest and kept us intrigued.
3. Regal engaged the consumer directly and continues participate with us even if selective.

4. They are monitoring our feedback here and other social media. Showe they are interested in what we think, willing to learn and adapt and looking to a longer presence in this market. I welcome this rather than having one player market.
5. Packaging and delivery method was better than I expected and delivery was included in price advertised.
6. Low number release and available to collectors first and not allowing multiple purchases gave us all a chance

On the negative ;

1. maybe withheld details although I get they had a marketing plan and they executed on it. Not a concern for me personally

2. Payment options caused some collectors to miss out. Could have cost one of us the #1 cards. I know my transaction was delayed cause I had to reprocess my transaction as I had to rethink whether I wanted to use credit or DD. Would have been useful to know options upfront either in Regal's communication or in Tradingcards site prior to checkout.

3. Number allocation policy disclosure. Obviously collectors want the best chance or at least be informed.

On the Langlands signature and in particular the one Richard received, yeh I would have initially been bummed if I received it. I would have gone through the same thought process and disappointment. But taking a step back I guess a guarantee from Regal or the legend may have been sufficient for me but in writing so if I wanted one day to sell I would have a chance on ROI. Also the card shows some character and an indication of the his growing frailty. I would also like to see what #23 and #25 sigs look like. When all is said and done #23,#24,#25/25 could be the most valuable cards if they end up being the last official cards he signs. Please take my last comment as a what/if scenario only, I wish our legend the best of health for many years to come.

All in all a good product with great legends at a reasonable price to collectors. I am sorry to have a good OZCT collector miss out but money back is reasonable if no replacement option was available.

I look forward to more high end cards and hope Richard gets in first on the next release.

Since when was delivery included in the price I got charged $15 for postage, I emailed footycards to see why as I assumed it was in the price but never got a reply, did anyone else pay postage?
 
I stand corrected, quote from the Regal post ;

"We can confirm that Graeme started out signing G Langlands and then changed to the full signature. He signed 6 cards only with G Langlands and the rest with Graeme Langlands.

Regal Trading Cards - For the Collector."
I would say 1-6 were g.langlands i have #03 and it's g.langlands
 
So looks like some of us paid postage and some didn't looks like footycards owes us some money
mine was included in the total cost $249.99 via platinum post. Wasn't platinum post think it was just express post. Wasn't this the deal? Why would you pay postage on top of something that had postage included.
 
mine was included in the total cost $249.99 via platinum post. Wasn't platinum post think it was just express post. Wasn't this the deal? Why would you pay postage on top of something that had postage included.
No idea but I bought both cards my total was 515.90 maybe people who bought both got charged postage
 
mine was included in the total cost $249.99 via platinum post. Wasn't platinum post think it was just express post. Wasn't this the deal? Why would you pay postage on top of something that had postage included.

Hey Shan, does your email invoice say $0 on shipping ? I thought I hadn't been charged extra postage either but I rechecked given Brendan's comment and I was. If we were all charged postage I have no issue but if there are some examples where postage wasn't then its a concern to those charged.
 
Hey Shan, does your email invoice say $0 on shipping ? I thought I hadn't been charged extra postage either but I rechecked given Brendan's comment and I was. If we were all charged postage I have no issue but if there are some examples where postage wasn't then its a concern to those charged.

Just checked, just has shipping method at the top "Platnum" and the total invoice price at the bottom ($249.99).
 
I think the confusing bit lies in the way it was stated ( $249.99 inc GST plus delivery.)

If delivery was included wouldn't it state ( $249.99 inc GST and delivery.) or
( $249.99 inc GST inc delivery.)?


I paid $262.49 and was happy to do so for such a great card.


#22 was signed G.Langlands
 
Last edited:
I think the confusing bit lies in the way it was stated ( $249.99 inc GST plus delivery.)

If delivery was included wouldn't it state ( $249.99 inc GST and delivery.) or
( $249.99 inc GST inc delivery.)?


I paid $262.49 and was happy to do so for such a great card.


#22 was signed G.Langlands

Correct. All cards were plus delivery. @FootyCards.com.au advised us that there was a small glitch on some orders which resulted in some people receiving free shipping.

Regal Trading Cards - For the Collector.
 
I think the confusing bit lies in the way it was stated ( $249.99 inc GST plus delivery.)

If delivery was included wouldn't it state ( $249.99 inc GST and delivery.) or
( $249.99 inc GST inc delivery.)?


I paid $262.49 and was happy to do so for such a great card.


#22 was signed G.Langlands

I assumed it was free delivery but payed the fee also.
My example of why I thought that is Maths --
5 plus 5 = 10 or 5 and 5 = 10 They are both the same $249.99 inc GST plus delivery - or $249.99 inc GST and delivery
$249.99 = a + b
a = GST
b = delivery
I was rather puzzled when from memory I was given 2 options with 2 prices of how I wanted it posted.
When it clearly stated all cards would be sent Australia Post Platinum Delivery.
Still happy though. This is not a complaint just an observation . Maybe next time they should word it different.eg (separate delivery charge)
When they put $249.99 inc.-------- I assumed everything after the abbreviation inc is included in the price.[/QUOTE]
 
I assumed it was free delivery but payed the fee also.
My example of why I thought that is Maths --
5 plus 5 = 10 or 5 and 5 = 10 They are both the same $249.99 inc GST plus delivery - or $249.99 inc GST and delivery
$249.99 = a + b
a = GST
b = delivery
I was rather puzzled when from memory I was given 2 options with 2 prices of how I wanted it posted.
When it clearly stated all cards would be sent Australia Post Platinum Delivery.
Still happy though. This is not a complaint just an observation . Maybe next time they should word it different.eg (separate delivery charge)
When they put $249.99 inc.-------- I assumed everything after the abbreviation inc is included in the price.
[/QUOTE]
I agree I read it as postage was included that's why I sent an email asking if it was or wasn't, never got a reply which was pretty poor that's why the question was raised, I'm sure a few things will be done differently next time
 
I agree I read it as postage was included that's why I sent an email asking if it was or wasn't, never got a reply which was pretty poor that's why the question was raised, I'm sure a few things will be done differently next time[/QUOTE]
Should have been free postage
 
Back
Top Bottom