Good lord. Please go back and read what I've said and try to comprehend it this time. Doesn't matter if you've surveyed 50 people or 500 people. We're talking about MY retractions no? That's what is in question. Who cares what others' retraction rates are. BTW, I have 17 in the past 6 months, not 27. But even at 27, 57 or even 777, it shouldn't matter as long as every single one of those retraction shows NO evidence of shilling, correct? I mean the whole point of you and those same guys who use this Retraction theory to steer my name and reputation in bad light is so that MAYBE it would validate me as a shiller/scammer. So if you were to check out every auction I had retractions and it clearly showed you that those bids were very very low and retracted very early on in the auction with plenty of days left that had no chance in manipulating or altering a sale of the card... could you still use that argument and continue to call me shady? That would be wrong. So again, I challenge you to find them and point out just ONE where it actually helped manipulate or shill the auction in any way. Until then... stop accusing someone of something they are not.
And the reason why I even posted the Retro shillers is because that's whats being discussed. It's completely different than my retracting behavior. They are NOT retracting LOW bids and early on in the auction like I have. Instead of looking at just the face value, consider the situation and how they are doing it. It's a different story. They've placed enormous bids and retracted late. Some of them have won and backed out on a few big auctions.