who got banned?
Think his userid was bigtimetosser or something like that
who got banned?
Think his userid was bigtimetosser or something like that
Having known both Grayson and Renee for a few years now, I'd like to congratulate them both on being chosen by Graham and the OZCT team to run exclusive group breaks. Cherry has always been transparent on how it's operated it's business, has been always run professionally and have always settled any dispute (not that there's been any of note) in favour of the customer.Thanks for taking the time to respond to my questions/suggestions
This next question is directed at both the mods and also to cherry. We have had highly respected members in the past go bad and owe people money.
Have the mods asked or has cherry offered to put up a cash security should the unthinkable happen and he absconds with members hard earned.
Having this security that the mods could then distribute to lessen any loss of the members is something that needs to be considered.
I am not suggesting 10's of thousands , perhaps the cost of a case of gold standard or one of the mid range products
Hey guys, great to see so much great feedback!
and if anyone thinks we make good mayo on this then they should check out my car...
Having known both Grayson and Renee for a few years now, I'd like to congratulate them both on being chosen by Graham and the OZCT team to run exclusive group breaks. Cherry has always been transparent on how it's operated it's business, has been always run professionally and have always settled any dispute (not that there's been any of note) in favour of the customer.
If Graham and the Mods would like any security I'm more than happy to put my hand up, however i suspect that they won't want any as they would've thought long and hard about this decision before making it......and they've done a bloody good job of running this forum for so long, doubt they'd jeopardise all their good work they've done over the years.
Do not get me wrong Ang, my question re the security deposit was not to question Grayson & Renee's business sense nor to question how the mods run this forum, it had the interests of other members at heart.
People can fall on hard times and things can turn pear shaped, as I said it happened to a few members on here who we're thought rather highly of and it left others out of pocket.
No offence taken Garth! I've been on the wrong end of a number of such 'hard times' to the tune of well over $4k. Only recently a 'Turtle' took me for $500.
Thanks Ang, and as you say, there won't be a need to - but thank you anyway.
Ultimately, as a legitimate business we have many levels of legislation to answer to and any aggrieved person has many outlets by which to reach us. However, we won't last in this niche community if we don't look after the customer.
Part of the reason the ban was put in place in the first place was to support the stores that we have, otherwise every 'long time member' does them and then there are no more stores.
Then we end up in the situation with no stores and every tom , d*** and Harry wanting to run a case share.
And you've been round long enough to know that group breaks can quite easily be rigged and just because you've been a good member doesn't mean something can change, plenty of examples of that.
What I was referring to mainly was case shares rather than group breaks. What was happening was people were buying from dacw or the like, paying no gst etc. Which damages the actual stores.If people want to take part in group breaks they will. If there are no reputable local options they will take part in US based breaks. If live group breaks are threatening stores, that means collectors must really like live group breaks. So the stores need to adapt. Sounds a bit like Gerry Harvey (Harvey Norman) trying to tell people that shopping online is bad because it harms local business (despite the online stores being mostly local). Adapt or die. It wouldn't be difficult at all for a card shop to organise their own group breaks if they are having trouble selling stock. The answer is to listen to the market and adapt accordingly, not ban everything that is new and different to protect your old business model.
Just my 2 cents worth.
And as far as asking for insurance goes, Cherry has just as much to lose as anyone else (actually more). He has to buy the stock!
Ok well this is the same argument as the harvey norman one then. His gripe was that people are avoiding gst by purchasing online so his business was suffering. The solution is to start selling online because that's what people want. In this case the solution is to offer group breaks or case shares, or any other way to make the hobby more feasible for australian collectors. Card shops in Australia should see this as an opportunity rather than a hinderance because it generally grows the hobby, and there's nothing stopping a card shop from doing a group break or case share for its customers. The advantage local shops will always have is giving people what they want immediately (no postage time). If a card shop down the road from me was doing group breaks and charging $60 a spot, but I could go online and get it for $50 a spot from USA, i'd get in the car and go down the road for the extra $10. Maybe that's just me.What I was referring to mainly was case shares rather than group breaks. What was happening was people were buying from dacw or the like, paying no gst etc. Which damages the actual stores.
And as far as asking for insurance goes, Cherry has just as much to lose as anyone else (actually more). He has to buy the stock!
In saying this, I too would be more than happy to see someone trustworthy like Garth to be a GB host as well, but then comes the issue of "why not drob50" or "why not GF4L" etc. !
Just in response to this sentence, yes Cherry did have to buy the stock but by offering the case in a group break and receiving payment for all spots he has recouped his money so therefore he is not losing, the people that now face loss are those in the group break should he decide to do a runner.
And don't try and use the argument that he has other boxes that he may have purchased because if he tried to "steal" money and still had unsold boxes and cases he would surely be one dumb criminal (not saying that Cherry are criminals or dumb). Then again prison is full of dumb criminals, they are the ones that got caught.
If everyone pays by paypal 'good' then there is no risk is there?
Doing group breaks where all the people are there live would be awesome. Would be more difficult to organise but that would make for a much more interesting group break!Ok well this is the same argument as the harvey norman one then. His gripe was that people are avoiding gst by purchasing online so his business was suffering. The solution is to start selling online because that's what people want. In this case the solution is to offer group breaks or case shares, or any other way to make the hobby more feasible for australian collectors. Card shops in Australia should see this as an opportunity rather than a hinderance because it generally grows the hobby, and there's nothing stopping a card shop from doing a group break or case share for its customers. The advantage local shops will always have is giving people what they want immediately (no postage time). If a card shop down the road from me was doing group breaks and charging $60 a spot, but I could go online and get it for $50 a spot from USA, i'd get in the car and go down the road for the extra $10. Maybe that's just me.
I thought paypal frowned upon group breaks or has their attitude changed?