I have found some more bootlegs. Was half tempted to get some but thought better of it. What are other members thought?
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/2012-Gra..._Rugby_League_Merchandise&hash=item4d076cc276
So I am assuming all the Images used in Dans book (And others) have written releases for thier use...
I mean, The cards do have copyright on them.
If not.... What's the difference?
Makes perfect sense...
then there is the whole subject release garble as well.
When the paper takes a photo of a person for the paper, That person is asked to sign a waiver so the photographer has the right to publish the picture (Even though it is thier picture) I assume this would be similar at least?
I also don't know the ins and outs of it all....
So I am assuming all the Images used in Dans book (And others) have written releases for thier use...
I mean, The cards do have copyright on them.
If not.... What's the difference?
I am writing a reference book, perfectly legal. Such as a stamp reference book like this one
http://www.booktopia.com.au/stamps-of-australia-alan-b-pitt/prod9780980524840.html
The difference is such as the stamp reference book is the cataloguing of information rather than making and designing your own product, whether it be legally or illegally.
Like the stamp reference book he only reports on official stamps, likewise I only list the official cards released by reputable companies.
Can someone please give me the eBay I'd for the guy that makes and sells these cards
I think this is appalling that the players don't get any royalties from these bogus cards, this should be Taffy Smith's No. 1 priority to stamp these bootleggers out of the game for once and all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?