Yer...PSA is GREAT rofl

And Hill your just upset cause im having a go at your baby PSA.....I dont like the fact that they grade (OC) and I'm allowed to have my opinion on it.

Upset ? I'm not upset at all - I just don't like people to look stupid by making uninformed comments. At the end of the day you've got the information, and you think it sucks then good for you. But the start of the thread you had no idea that they graded with Qualifiers which is why you should be informed and have all the info.
 
Upset ? I'm not upset at all - I just don't like people to look stupid by making uninformed comments. At the end of the day you've got the information, and you think it sucks then good for you. But the start of the thread you had no idea that they graded with Qualifiers which is why you should be informed and have all the info.

your right mate but even after being informed I still dont think its right that a card with centering like that can be graded a 9, as I said if they are grading (OC) where does it end in the future? The whole idea of getting a card graded is to have its correct grade not a grade with exceptions ..for example...( well its a 9 if you dont count centering) I dont like it at all and thats what im saying.
 
Personally I don't like qualifiers and I wouldnt buy an OC card. But I think there is a place for qualifiers, just not necessarily on newer stuff.

With vintage, where the population reports of cards are so low and the chances of getting another high grade example of a card is rare, then a person having a card graded may decide that they think the card has sharp corners and the only thing wrong with it is centering. They request a qualifier,and get it. So what it is saying to the buyer of the card is "this card is a great example of a vintage card, it would have been a 9 if not for the centering". There are collectors out there (especially with vintage) where having a really sharp example of a card is more important than having a well centred card with fuzzy corners. Especially if the chances of that card popping up again is minimal.

And OC isn't the only qualifier - there are others ie MK (Mark),ST (Stain) PD (Print Defect). Things like ST are used where there might be a wax stain on the back of a card, PD where the printing may be slightly out of focus or there is a slight ink splotch on the card. They didn't have the modern printing presses they churn out the cards with these days.

So as I said I think there is a place, just not my cup of tea on newer cards.
 
It's still in a 9 condition. Why should the collector be penalised cos it wasnt cut/printed correctly?

Sure if it had a bung corner it wouldnt be a 9 no matter the qualifier.
 
Personally I don't like qualifiers and I wouldnt buy an OC card. But I think there is a place for qualifiers, just not necessarily on newer stuff.

With vintage, where the population reports of cards are so low and the chances of getting another high grade example of a card is rare, then a person having a card graded may decide that they think the card has sharp corners and the only thing wrong with it is centering. They request a qualifier,and get it. So what it is saying to the buyer of the card is "this card is a great example of a vintage card, it would have been a 9 if not for the centering". There are collectors out there (especially with vintage) where having a really sharp example of a card is more important than having a well centred card with fuzzy corners. Especially if the chances of that card popping up again is minimal.

And OC isn't the only qualifier - there are others ie MK (Mark),ST (Stain) PD (Print Defect). Things like ST are used where there might be a wax stain on the back of a card, PD where the printing may be slightly out of focus or there is a slight ink splotch on the card. They didn't have the modern printing presses they churn out the cards with these days.

So as I said I think there is a place, just not my cup of tea on newer cards.


They maybe they need a cut-off date for production of cards for these (OC)'s and others...I mean are they going to start grading exquisites with (CC) chipped corners cause Im sure alot of people would jump at it lol

and mavs who cares whos fault it is?? a cards grade is its grade no matter how it came to be it that shape
 
They maybe they need a cut-off date for production of cards for these (OC)'s and others...I mean are they going to start grading exquisites with (CC) chipped corners cause Im sure alot of people would jump at it lol

and mavs who cares whos fault it is?? a cards grade is its grade no matter how it came to be it that shape


How do you determine a grade?
 
The card should grade exactly how it is when presented to the grading company...NO EXCEPTIONS! If its off centre of has a water mark or whatever else.....BAD LUCK...THATS THE CONDITION OF THE CARD!!!!
 
But if the card is mint, shouldnt it be graded mint?

Obviously cards with qualifiers could be valued less (not saying they are, because I don't know from personal experience). But if a card is OC, wouldnt you like to know what it would grade if it wasnt?? I would.
 
But if the card is mint, shouldnt it be graded mint?

Obviously cards with qualifiers could be valued less (not saying they are, because I don't know from personal experience). But if a card is OC, wouldnt you like to know what it would grade if it wasnt?? I would.

no not at all, because of the fact it is OC it ISN'T MINT and therefore shouldn't be graded as such.
 
I mean are they going to start grading exquisites with (CC) chipped corners cause Im sure alot of people would jump at it lol

Yeah wouldnt happen. PSA have a thing called "Grading Standards" - try finding the same on the BGS site.

http://psacard.com/grading/grading_standards.chtml

QUALIFIERS:

PSA will grade nearly every card submitted. Cards having significant flaws will receive "qualified" grades as follows:


OC (Off Center):


When the centering of the card falls below the minimum standard for that grade will be designated "OC." PSA determines centering by comparing the measurements of the borders from left to right and top to bottom. The centering is designated as the percent of difference at the most off-center part of the card. A 5% leeway is given to the front centering minimum standards for cards which grade NM 7 or better. For example, a card which meets all of the other requirements for PSA MINT 9 and measures 60/40 off-center on the front automatically meets the PSA front centering standards for MINT 9. If a card meets all of the other requirements for PSA MINT 9 and measures 65/35 off-center on the front, it may be deemed to meet the PSA front centering standards for MINT 9 if the eye appeal of the card is good.

ST (Staining):

) Cards with staining below the minimum standards for the grade will be designated "ST."

PD (Print Defect):

Cards with significant printing defects will be designated "PD."

OF (Out of Focus):

Cards with focus below the minimum standards for the grade will be designated "OF."

MK (Marks):

Cards with writing, ink marks, pencil marks, etc. will be designated "MK."

MC (Miscut):

): Cards with a factory miscut, such as a diamond cut, or when another card's image is on the original card will be designated "MC."

UNGRADEABLE CARDS:

PSA will not grade cards which bear evidence of trimming, re-coloring, restoration, or any other forms of tampering, or are of questionable authenticity. In addition, PSA does not grade autographed cards dated earlier than 1998 or any cards manufactured by Star except Star Baseball & 1996 Star Topps (reprint) Basketball Cards; only factory imprint signatures can be graded.
 
?????????????????

That's ok "mate" your first post said it all. Looking forward to your next informed and well thought out post.
 
Shoes, grading companies (specifically speaking of PSA) are not 'moving forward' and adding more qualifiers. From reading you're posts, I come to the conclusion that this is what you're thinking. They only "qualify" printing imperfections, not condition imperfections. Most of these wouldn't even come into consideration for modern cards. That's what some of the graded lovers are trying to say I think.
 
Back
Top Bottom