Spurs have been winning regularly with their Starters missing! If you recall, they NEARLY beat Miami without Duncan, Manu, Parker and Green!The game is structured today that no team could survive without it's best three players.
LA is proof of how close the comp is. They have a great team that just isn't jelling and they can't win.
Spurs have been winning regularly with their Starters missing! If you recall, they NEARLY beat Miami without Duncan, Manu, Parker and Green!
Miami has a bunch of role players surrounding the big 3. I agree with Matt ^^, Knicks and Denver are 2 great examples of 'depth'!
LOL, yes they did, I'm no Spurs supporter, but I think they are the best coached team in the game today.
But they wouldn't win a 7 game series without those guys. Against OKC or LAC, no way. I think you took my statement, which applied to the average team or most teams and stuck it to the most successful team in the last ten years, possibly last 30 years.
Denver is an example of depth that will not do much until the get a go to scorer, like, KD, LBJ, KB, CA, CP or like the Spurs do, 4 guys that can do it. Some one to take over and destroy defences when the game is on the line, Denver needs that one guy.
Battier and Ray Allen would start for a lot of teams. Norris has the chance be a star once Wade goes, if he takes on what these stars are showing and doing.
Off topic, what is the best ten year win percentage of any team from the last 30 years ? I would like to know.
I don't think it is considered 'depth' when they can't win on their own! lol
if you take Lebron, Wade and Bosh out of Miami, they are a 20 win team at best!
Bosh????? Really????? Dude couldn't hit the broad side of a barn right now.
Someone saw the 2 airballs he threw up to start the All Star game! lolBosh????? Really????? Dude couldn't hit the broad side of a barn right now.
The batman was the dude who stalked all of our boxes here in the early days.
I was just last night looking through his rookie cards on Beckett and COMC to see if a set was worth making.+1 i was one of his victims.
Shane is shooting 60% from 3 pt land in the last nine games.
They won all nine games.
He is building the big four.
Now I know you are just messing with us!!
Danny Green is 43% on the season with more than 70 extra attempts than Battier, and Danny is a role player! The same as Battier is!
Who is the fourth 'Big' on the Spurs?? lolThat's because the Spurs have a big four already, just that NBA . com doesn't want anyone to know it.
Danny would be a star with many teams.
Shane's game has lifted in the last nine games, no one can argue that. He isn't the reason they are winning, but he is helping.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?