I think I still like the idea of top of each division, but that still means there are 5 more teams for the best record to move into the other playoff spots. Maybe still rank all the conference by their record, but the top 3 division leaders make it through automatically? No point having divisions if there is no difference to having 1 large division.
Yes, we may be able to make that adjustment
I have to say I disagree. There are a lot of new players, but in the West there is only 4 new players who were not participating in Season 1.
It could once again end up that players with strong records miss out because they are not leading their division, and hypothetically if say Ben had the best record and myself and Ranga were #2 and #3 (not unrealistic), we would be seeded 4th and 5th.
That means automatically one of us wouldn't go through to the 2nd round, and that doesn't seem fair.
Michael - Can you make it the way the NBA does? Having the top four seeds as 3 of the Divisional Champs and the additional winningest team, but ranked via winning %. Just like it says on wiki (as you showed us). That to me is the fairest and best, and hey if the NBA does it like that then why shouldn't we.
Maybe we can have a vote on it. The way I see it the best gamers should be in the best position and be given the advantage to go the furthest, after all they are the teams that have played the hardest and done the best to win the most amount of games. Winning the division if it is a weak one shouldn't be rewarded if the team has a poor overall record.
That is better overall for both conferences.
This is what I suggested in my post above. If we had the 3 best records, and used the method Michael posted, we'd be ranked 1st, 2nd and 5th (I think I said 4th above...if so my mistake). What is wrong with this? In the end, it doesn't matter much more than that cause either way, to win the conference and then title you have to beat everyone!
And if the division is weak, so be it. They won the division, they get into the playoffs. This happens in real life so why not in our bball?
Haha I was agreeing with you Ben!
Saying the way Michael posted and the way the NBA does it is the best way.
And yes I agree they should deserve to get into the playoffs, I just didn't agree the three winners get the top three seeds.
The top 3 seeds and other winningest as top 4 ranked by winning % is the best way (as YOU SAID) haha - all good man!
id prefer afternoon but its a group of 30 users
computer shouldnt pick to badly for me
Anyone else having trouble with signing in to the PSN??
Generate and let 2K randomise itself. Will post on here and PS3 PM's beforehand (probably wont be until late tomorrow night) so that anyone about can login and see the list pop up instantly.
Ahh stupid me, for some reason thought you were doing it manually like a box break when u throw names in a hatYeah nice one, think im gonna save some coin and not go out tomorrow night for once, so def let us when ur doin it and its up
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?