hairyangryfella
Tag Team Quads 93/94
Here is the next correspondence:
Hi Jeromy, I am the buyer of this card and I completely trust Matt who has helped me many times before. Here is the deal:
This item was bought off ebay and the seller stated it was mint and should grade at least a 9. I am in New Zealand and knew I wanted to get this graded and therefore had it shipped directly to Matt. Had there been any issue when it arrived we would have had it sent back to the seller. It looked gem mint (according to Matt in an email just after he had posted the card), and despite not feeling comfortable about the way your site says to package the card, he did it exactly as advised. The card was gem mint when it was sent out, and I said that I would give Matt more 'thank you' money the higher the grade it returned. If it was damaged we wouldn't have bothered sending it off!
It comes down to you not admitting fault and blaming him for his packaging or damage in transit - though the crease is exactly where the card was taped which strongly implies one of your guys damaging it when unpacking it. It also comes down to the fact that because we don't have a scan of the card before sending to you (other than the ebay picture) we have no comeback? Your stance on this situation is absolutely shameful - not only has one of your people damaged a rare and historic card, but you've also destroyed the value of it and are simply saying 'tough, you have no proof'.
As for you saying that have damaged cards in the past and 'stepped up' - I can offer you an example where this is not true - does a 1992 Courtside Flashbacks Autograph of Larry Bird ring any bells? It's from a while ago but what do you have to say about this - http://www.ozcardtrader.com.au/forum/general-forum/11576-bgs-suck-balls-rotten-dirty-liars-d.html
I knew this would come down to 'your word vs mine' and as quite a few people have said to me, you have to scan everything and not package it up how they tell you, but this was my first ever grading attempt and it will absolutely be the last...
I eagerly await your reply.
Thank you for the email. The link you provided is another situation in which there was no proof that we damaged a card. We are not going to pay for damaged cards if we have no proof that we damaged them. Your story adds another level to where the card could have been damaged. I am not saying this but what is to say that Matt didn’t damage the card (knowingly or unknowingly) when he received it from the seller, taped it up, and sent it to us. Again, I AM NOT SAYING MATT DAMAGED THE CARD but I am saying that you don’t know what happened to the card once it left the sellers hands nor do you know if the seller actually sent you a card in mint condition as claimed. Maybe Matt missed the damage when he received the card and it was there the whole time. There are so many things that could have happened to this card. We handle thousands of cards each day and for damage to happen is very rare but it does happen. If we damage a card, we will compensate the customer. In this situation, you sent the card, which someone else received from an Ebay seller, packaged it, and sent it to us. Could we have damaged the card and not known it…sure but I have no proof that is the case and can not pay you for something that can’t be proven. An $1800 card is not worth our reputation so if we damaged the card, we would pay you. We have damaged cards that were much more valuable then this and never had an issue paying for our mistakes
I recommend you contact the seller on Ebay and tell him the card didn’t grade a 9 mint like he claimed. Maybe the seller will refund your fees but Beckett will not be able to compensate you for a card that we have no proof was damaged by us. I know I continue to say this but it is the case. There is no proof that we damaged the card, nor is there any proof that Matt damaged the card, or proof that the card was not damaged in the mail (between the Ebay Seller or to Beckett), or that the card was damaged when Matt received it from the seller. It is one story against another story against another story and Beckett will not pay for a card that we can not prove was damaged here. I am sorry and hope you understand what I am saying. We simply can’t pay out claims based on accusations. I am not blaming any one person but I am saying BGS can’t be blamed for this, solely. There is really nothing else I can say about this but if you have any other questions or comments, please let me know.
While I can see their point, I still think it's crap. I have two emails from Matt - one when he sent it saying "it looked gem mint, nothing at all wrong with it" and one when he got it back talking about the obvious crease that he would have noticed.
So it's come down to Beckett's word vs Matt's word - and I know that I trust Matt completely.
I also don't like his suggestion to return it to the seller, I wouldn't do that because that's just not cool, so hopefully the postal insurance can get something out of it, but again, we cannot 'prove' condition when it was sent so I don't know how that's likely to go.
Hi Jeromy, I am the buyer of this card and I completely trust Matt who has helped me many times before. Here is the deal:
This item was bought off ebay and the seller stated it was mint and should grade at least a 9. I am in New Zealand and knew I wanted to get this graded and therefore had it shipped directly to Matt. Had there been any issue when it arrived we would have had it sent back to the seller. It looked gem mint (according to Matt in an email just after he had posted the card), and despite not feeling comfortable about the way your site says to package the card, he did it exactly as advised. The card was gem mint when it was sent out, and I said that I would give Matt more 'thank you' money the higher the grade it returned. If it was damaged we wouldn't have bothered sending it off!
It comes down to you not admitting fault and blaming him for his packaging or damage in transit - though the crease is exactly where the card was taped which strongly implies one of your guys damaging it when unpacking it. It also comes down to the fact that because we don't have a scan of the card before sending to you (other than the ebay picture) we have no comeback? Your stance on this situation is absolutely shameful - not only has one of your people damaged a rare and historic card, but you've also destroyed the value of it and are simply saying 'tough, you have no proof'.
As for you saying that have damaged cards in the past and 'stepped up' - I can offer you an example where this is not true - does a 1992 Courtside Flashbacks Autograph of Larry Bird ring any bells? It's from a while ago but what do you have to say about this - http://www.ozcardtrader.com.au/forum/general-forum/11576-bgs-suck-balls-rotten-dirty-liars-d.html
I knew this would come down to 'your word vs mine' and as quite a few people have said to me, you have to scan everything and not package it up how they tell you, but this was my first ever grading attempt and it will absolutely be the last...
I eagerly await your reply.
Thank you for the email. The link you provided is another situation in which there was no proof that we damaged a card. We are not going to pay for damaged cards if we have no proof that we damaged them. Your story adds another level to where the card could have been damaged. I am not saying this but what is to say that Matt didn’t damage the card (knowingly or unknowingly) when he received it from the seller, taped it up, and sent it to us. Again, I AM NOT SAYING MATT DAMAGED THE CARD but I am saying that you don’t know what happened to the card once it left the sellers hands nor do you know if the seller actually sent you a card in mint condition as claimed. Maybe Matt missed the damage when he received the card and it was there the whole time. There are so many things that could have happened to this card. We handle thousands of cards each day and for damage to happen is very rare but it does happen. If we damage a card, we will compensate the customer. In this situation, you sent the card, which someone else received from an Ebay seller, packaged it, and sent it to us. Could we have damaged the card and not known it…sure but I have no proof that is the case and can not pay you for something that can’t be proven. An $1800 card is not worth our reputation so if we damaged the card, we would pay you. We have damaged cards that were much more valuable then this and never had an issue paying for our mistakes
I recommend you contact the seller on Ebay and tell him the card didn’t grade a 9 mint like he claimed. Maybe the seller will refund your fees but Beckett will not be able to compensate you for a card that we have no proof was damaged by us. I know I continue to say this but it is the case. There is no proof that we damaged the card, nor is there any proof that Matt damaged the card, or proof that the card was not damaged in the mail (between the Ebay Seller or to Beckett), or that the card was damaged when Matt received it from the seller. It is one story against another story against another story and Beckett will not pay for a card that we can not prove was damaged here. I am sorry and hope you understand what I am saying. We simply can’t pay out claims based on accusations. I am not blaming any one person but I am saying BGS can’t be blamed for this, solely. There is really nothing else I can say about this but if you have any other questions or comments, please let me know.
While I can see their point, I still think it's crap. I have two emails from Matt - one when he sent it saying "it looked gem mint, nothing at all wrong with it" and one when he got it back talking about the obvious crease that he would have noticed.
So it's come down to Beckett's word vs Matt's word - and I know that I trust Matt completely.
I also don't like his suggestion to return it to the seller, I wouldn't do that because that's just not cool, so hopefully the postal insurance can get something out of it, but again, we cannot 'prove' condition when it was sent so I don't know how that's likely to go.