So what your saying is that if someone on this forum sold me, say for example a 2007 Darren Lockyer signature tazo for $500 and me being the buyer was prepared to spend that sort of money to add this item to my collection (but you the other collector was saying that it's only worth $300) than i am getting ripped off? It's the buyer's final decision if they would like to buy it or not and depending how badly they wanted it, true? I have brought lots of collectables over the past 20 years at good prices and sometimes even paying alot more than its value because i want or need that item for my collection. So i don't really see how you not being the buyer or seller can say or determine if the price is fair or not?