Barkley for me. Career stats of 22.1 ppg at 54 fg% and 11.7 rpg over 16 years.
Uh, didn't most players of that era have high rebound numbers..? If Ewing played then he'd have had a whole lot more, so I think that's a dumb point to bring up.
Ewing was the Knicks. If he had better surrounding players, or been in a slightly different time, he may have won a championship.
Malone would probably have been the first person in my mind, not sure who I'd actually go with though.
Comparing guys from the 50/60's to the 80/90's will never compare. Plenty of guys who knew how to grab a rebound could do so. There are tonnes of guys who averaged above 15rpg. If you were over 6-5 then it was given. Without looking at it, there must have been a lot more possessions per game in the day with quicker shots or something. Post 1980, there were a lot more 7 footers to rebound the balls. Wilt wouldn't have put up the same numbers 25 years later. Was he great, no doubt, but he was going up against guys who were 6-9 at best. The whole rebounding argument in favour of Baylor is skewed IMO.
If we are going to dig up old names, why stop at Baylor (not discrediting his game here)?
Bob Pettit 26.4ppg, 16.2rpg, 3.0apg. Interesting fact, he never lead the league in rebounds which included a season of over 20rpg...
This is based on opinions and Stockton is ranked highest here-
http://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/ratings.cgi
Player: malone
Team: seattle sonics kemp/payton days.
Then that means no second three peat for bulls
I would hope so!!Other picks must be all Barkley yeah?