Being a warriors and nrl fan im disappointed that a former warriors player would fight and be prosecuted for that acts he committed.But in saying that i cant understand that a player who sexually assaulted a women and was be found guilty of that crime serves no time, opposed to a 2 year sentence not sure how that works out
Well the NRL refused to register the contract so it was not like the Knights had any choice.
Im not trying to defend Packer but there seems to be a bit of the "Steve Irwin" rule applied here. If he was one of the games stars I bet the outcome would have been different.
Even Sonny Bill?I think if it was one of the stars the judge would have given the maximum as well...