Player Collection Debate

[loafic]

As long as my PC player is on it, then it's PC all the way baby!

spot on brother!

 

[Sanctum]

Do you consider a card part of a player collection if there are other players taking up real estate?

To answer your question as the question is written, yes.

With regards to the PC Battle competition, no.

Also, 1000th post for me, yay.

 

[BRONBRON]

I'm another one that goes off the Beckett list. If it is included on there then I want it in the PC!!!

 

[Cobretti]

To answer your question as the question is written, yes.

With regards to the PC Battle competition, no.

Also, 1000th post for me, yay.

you make an interesting point. Why not the battle if you think yes to the questiion?

 

[Sanctum]

you make an interesting point. Why not the battle if you think yes to the questiion?

Well, in regards collecting, I think anything with your player on it is definitely fit for a Player collection.

But in terms of the PC Battle, I don't feel that if my PC player is Lamar Odom, I should be presenting a dual auto with Kobe. I should be presenting the best cards I have of Lamar without relying on another players merit to give the card wow factor.

That might be a little precious having read it back to myself, but it's just my opinion.

 

[spurlec]

Personally I collect the player only, each to their own. Either way supercharged was going to smash us!!!!

 

[taffster74]

As far i i'm concerned, if it's listed as a player card for my pc's then it's in. Someone mentioned the Donruss team checklists - some of those do have players clear to see on them. Take, for example the boston celtics checklist - sitting immediately to shaq's right is Kevin Garnett. Therefore, that is a Garnett PC card for me. It could also be considered a pc card for Shaq, Tony Allen,Rajon Rondo, Nenad Krstic, Marquis Daniels or Nate robinson -all of whom can be clearly identified on the card.

 

[Cobretti]

Personally I collect the player only, each to their own. Either way supercharged was going to smash us!!!!

No doubts there, phenominal collection.

The more I thought about it this morning whilst I tried to sleep the more I think for me it is about the money as I stated above last night. A high end jordan on his own is pricey, so throw in a kobe or lebron doubles the card value again. So if I am going to spend $1000+ on a card, personally I rather have MJ only.

 

[A_Iverson_I]

Well, in regards collecting, I think anything with your player on it is definitely fit for a Player collection.

But in terms of the PC Battle, I don't feel that if my PC player is Lamar Odom, I should be presenting a dual auto with Kobe. I should be presenting the best cards I have of Lamar without relying on another players merit to give the card wow factor.

That might be a little precious having read it back to myself, but it's just my opinion.

Actually I agree with that!

 

[KB.]

I understand why people wouldn't want to PC multi-player cards as it would make the PC chase a bit different.

I personally, being a completist, want to have everything Aminu is featured on, this being the case, I know I'll have to spend more for cards featuring superstars such as the cards he's featured on with Blake. If my PC player was featured on a bunch of cards with MJ, I'd have to considering not collection multi-player cards.

So to answer the question, Yes, I do considering multi-player cards as PC cards.

 

[tagged]

Sweet card, but if I had a 1/1 patch of my player I'd value it higher than a 1/1 triple patch. I'd still need to have both.