Yea and IDE like then to have more logo man patches coz I love them and hopefully one day they have a derrick rose logo manf u panini and hurry up
oh they are cheap too but they have to be (not acceptable though), Panini dont they have the licenses!
Rubbish! License or not, they could both put more effort into it! At least Panini's is less noticable!
Retro was just pulling the p***, same with Exquisite!
These problems are within the hobby, I just get sick of hearing people bag Panini for doing what every company has been doing fo r years, just because they are now the sole license holders!
I was bagging Panini not so much for same photos... as for fifty million friggin Muskies photos... the Muskies were an ABA team I think, IF that... had NOTHING to do with the Timberwolves other than us being forced to come up with some vintage crap jersey and Panini decided we need heaps of cards with this inconsequential jersey on them... it was just a rant about that everyone has turned it into more, I still love most of Panini's card designs I just want more wolf and less muskie
There is? I've never seen it, what product?????? Got a pic?There already is Derrick Rose logomen!
Do u have that d rose logoman!!!!?????
Fair enough!
BTW, the Muskies jersey is a Minnesota ABA jersey, like the Spurs wearing the Chapparals jerseys. While the designs are pretty crap, the respect to the history is pretty cool imo
Do u have that d rose logoman!!!!?????
So it's ok when UD does it?
Now Exquisite:
Im not a big fan of either company, but to compare a company for using the same pictures of a college player (4years) in the 70s when photography was no where near the amount of a prime player in the NBA during its peak years for a 14 year career is just plain dumb.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?