[Sarcasm on] That awesome feeling you get when your "hit" is some no name WBBL player that nobody has ever heard of. [Sarcasm off].
Having started opening packs all I can say is too much WBBL content in this set that has very little collector interest or resale value.
Would not surprise me in the least they do have a track record of trying to alienate sections of their supporter base.Cricket Australia stipulated 40% of the set must be WBBL.
Grateful to have cricket cards to buy even though I am a relatively smaller cricket collector but it seems to me that TnP take one step forward and half a step back.
Some nice new themes this release and finally signature cards are foil numbered. The personalisation of low numbered signature cards is a great idea.
Distribution and timing were big issues last year but are spot on this time.
I agree with the above sentiments, too much WBBL content, too little CA content and far too many low end insert sets. Tough for TnP if it is a directive from CA about the WBBL content and I get having lots of easy to collect, shiny low end bits to appeal to kids but there needs to be balance.
The Shield Legends are nice but should be one per box and /375. Bump the six hitters to 1:18 and also have team based predictors at 1:72 for both BBL and WBBL. Winning predictors redeem a numbered champions set or Captain signature and a full set redeems a numbered card for bes player of each franchise.
I do like the predictor idea!!!
I predicted that you would!!
I get the feeling that this was somehow put forward earlier but never got across the line? hmmmm.....
Would you say it was ‘dismissed’?
LOL yes lets just say it was plumb and the Captain wouldn't let me refer it!
Picked up 4 packs from the servo today. Just got around to opening them up ... and discovered the 4 packs matched 4 other packs I opened up recently CARD for CARD (well, except for 2 of the 4 inserts.) In other words 34 of 36 cards from the 4 packs were the exact same cards in the exact same order as the 4 other packs. Anybody else seeing bad/repetitive collation?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?