100% agree with BT there. He should’ve just owned up and admitted his particular actions. Instead he kept apologising ‘for my role’ without actually acknowledging what he’d done. He also used ‘we’ a lot, sounded like he was implying that Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft had acted just as bad as him. Didn’t seem to want to accept that he was the ringleader.@The Mad Hatter: Mate, the numbers sadly tell only a very small part of the respective stories.
Consider the opening paragraph of Cricinfo's biography of Neil Harvey: "One of Australia's all-time favourite cricketing sons, Neil Harvey was a gifted left-hand batsman, brilliantly athletic fielder, and occasional offspin bowler. On account of the richness of his talents, he served Victoria, New South Wales and Australia with great distinction during a first-class career which spanned the 16-year period between 1946-47 and 1962-63."
Ian Chappell's Test average of 42.42 lands him in 41st place on the list of "best batting averages by an Australian player in Test cricket" - 2 places above HIM sits Usman Khawaja. It's why the "Best since Bradman" tag for Steven Smith has felt so galling to me.
Modern conditions have tilted the contest between bat and ball to a point where it has become unfair. In a perverse manner, perhaps this is why the current Australian team has ended up "here".
@Keatoboy: I think David Warner is playing a very carefully considered and deliberate long game. He knows that now is not the time to launch, particularly if he wishes to return to the game. I can see why these type of things play out the way they do. It's what follows that will capture our interest. Brian Taylor on MMM just now: "It sounds insincere...and coached".
100% agree with BT there. He should’ve just owned up and admitted his particular actions. Instead he kept apologising ‘for my role’ without actually acknowledging what he’d done. He also used ‘we’ a lot, sounded like he was implying that Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft had acted just as bad as him. Didn’t seem to want to accept that he was the ringleader.
Surely Smith , Warner , and Bancroft has enough common sense ( but obviously they didn`t )to know what implications were going to occur if they went through with it but they still all whet on and did it ....
I think they thought they knew what the implications were if caught.
1 match ban, accusations of cheating and some bad press but given the pressure and desire to win were happy to take the chance.
What they didnt expect was the response from the Aus media, public and CA.
I dont know what to make of Warners presser, no doubt he has used the time to seek legal advice and is doing everything by the book with a view to challenging CA decission.
I cant help thinking he is the only one of the trio who has resigned himself to not playing again for Aus and is looking at a way to salvage another 10 or so years playing the international T20 circuit.
A week on, what is everyone feeling about this awful mess, the Australian team....and the game of cricket generally?
Are you at the "denial", "anger", "bargaining", "depression" or "acceptance" stage?
Have your views changed completely since last Sunday?
Do you fear that the answer to "who knew what" will be too much to cope with?
For those of you that play, umpire or volunteer for cricket clubs: are you ready to pack it in altogether, or are you determined to be a standard-bearer for the way the game SHOULD be played?
Have you adopted the women's team as THE Australian team now?
To some, the above questions might be melodramatic - in defence, I merely submit approximately 28 years of devotion to what has essentially been a important hobby: following cricket.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?