/\/\ depends what you call home-grown. most of those players played for a different youth teams before they were signed by united.
and personally, i was sticking up for united (pretty rare) in saying that they deserved to spend big on players, unlike chelski and city...
we were saying they havent produced an OUTSTANDING player in a while. i wouldnt consider any of the recent players on that list 'outstanding'.
last time you accused me of saying fergie makes dumb buys, which i never said. maybe you should read what we write instead of automatically sticking up for united. theyre not perfect...
/\/\ depends what you call home-grown. most of those players played for a different youth teams before they were signed by united.
and personally, i was sticking up for united (pretty rare) in saying that they deserved to spend big on players, unlike chelski and city...
we were saying they havent produced an OUTSTANDING player in a while. i wouldnt consider any of the recent players on that list 'outstanding'.
last time you accused me of saying fergie makes dumb buys, which i never said. maybe you should read what we write instead of automatically sticking up for united. theyre not perfect...
Fair comment but it gets a bit old and contradictory when United fans keep crapping on about their amazing development/academy when they've bought as much success as the next team. That's what gets my goat at times. Sure they had a golden era with Beckham, Scoles, Rat Neville etc but they haven't produced a player of great note outa there own academy in a while and they buy their players just like everyone else
Sorry Sgt Pepper but in no was was my comment regarding home grown players directed at you. It was directed at the below comment.
However you did say "fergie is a boob in the transfer market" (post 82) - sorry if i misinterpreted that.
You can hardly sit there are have a go at Utd's development when no team in England has produced a home grown player of any serious world class talent in donkeys years. Everybody knows the transfer policies of team like Chelsea and Man City (amongst others) has had a direct impact on the opportunities of English players. Robinho anyone???
Any rumours/talk anyone would like to discuss.
And stop the United hatingI'm not hating City, Arsenal or West Ham
unconditional love? haha. yeah right.
Nasri wants 110k per week, Arsenal can afford 90k, Sir Alex reportedly offering him 130k a week.. Interesting!
Cesc is still a much better player than Nasri when fit. For the sake of 20k I'm sure Nasri is going to re-sign. And there is no way Wenger will do business with another English rival. Arsenal don't need the money, and would rather send him to Italy or Spain if it comes to that.
No doubting Nasri's class, but his form fell away over the last third of the season. He also gets his fair share of assists, but Fabregas has led the EPL in assists the last couple of seasons, and has more assists than anyone in the top 5 leagues in Europe over the last 5 seasonsi think thats debatable. nasri is pure class. has been since he was 15. they play different roles, so its hard to say i guess. their games played:goals scored ratio is just about the same, and nasri gets more assists. hes also more exciting to watch. i think anyway.
i agree that wenger wouldnt sell him to another top english club, but hes only got one year left on his contract, and then its out of arsenes hands. i hope youre right, and he re-signs.
Its still a big debt incurred from buying players that is now bitting them in the butt.
I think it just more shows that from a cashflow perspective you want to have your team in the most popular league in the world.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?