I agree with Elek, name and shame. The name of the member needs to be revealed as we do not need people who are in this game to blatantly profit from others. Obviously this person has never heard of the terminology "Gentlemans Agreement"
And if the seller has "bills to pay" then why are they buying product when there is obviously more important things in their live. Also wouldn't the money they would be getting back from Ming help with these bills.
I have my suspicions as to who the other party may be
I agree with the name and shame. This is what I'd be most worried about and I'd hate for it to be me.Might save a other members from getting taken by him also.
You mean a "Dislike" button?We need a "this is not on button" similar to the like button to show what appears to be widespread condemnation of the other party involved
You mean a "Dislike" button?
Yeah you're right.A "this is not on button" sends a firmer message
Why don't l name some great sellers instead.I agree with the name and shame. This is what I'd be most worried about and I'd hate for it to be me.
Why don't l name some great sellers instead.
Cherry
Pappazzi
Who dat
I see what you did there
You have read my mind.Why don't l name some great sellers instead.
Cherry
Pappazzi
Who dat
I'm sure there are plenty of others too.
I see what you did there
lol i thought i was the only one who noticed
Why don't l name some great sellers instead.
Cherry
Pappazzi
Who dat
I'm sure there are plenty of others too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?