saintsforever
OzCardTrader
Did any dragons, get any points, i wouldbe surprised
Did any dragons, get any points, i wouldbe surprisedA
I know people like stats but Johnson played half a year , find me a Sharks fan that would give him a wrap and I’d be surprised. Goal kicking has been amateur at best .
As for indiscretions, it was my belief they stopped taking that into account years ago . Save the charity stories for another award . He also won a Churchill medal in a losing team that was controversial.
Also if you look at the top 5 dally m points on each team that tells the story .
Papali was the next best for Canberra with 7 points I believe .
I believe the dragon mascot polled 8Did any dragons, get any points, i wouldbe surprised
Playing in a solid team where several players poll points during the season can definitely dint your chances of winning
Probably the only 1 that deserves any except for duftyI believe the dragon mascot polled 8
I think Cam McInnes pulled his weight.Probably the only 1 that deserves any except for dufty
Yeah, he was probably way ahead of dufty.I think Cam McInnes pulled his weight.
Under the same section that files the Sharks and NRL saying Cronulla where over the Cap in 2015 and 2017 but not 2016Interesting quote from Cam Smiths new book . Made me wonder will it be in the fiction or non fiction section ?
I think he meant to say crap not cap.Interesting quote from Cam Smiths new book . Made me wonder will it be in the fiction or non fiction section ?
Cmon mateUnder the same section that files the Sharks and NRL saying Cronulla where over the Cap in 2015 and 2017 but not 2016
You don’t sign 2 seperate contracts and get boats delivered to your house under standard contracts . You’d be naive to think they all don’t do it but this was different and for him to never address the 2 contracts is what left a bad taste .I think he meant to say crap not cap.
One could argue the same with Gallen and the Sharks side not knowing what they where putting in there bodies and just “doing what they are told”? Horses for coursesYou don’t sign 2 seperate contracts and get boats delivered to your house under standard contracts . You’d be naive to think they all don’t do it but this was different and for him to never address the 2 contracts is what left a bad taste .
Whatever happen to the good old brown paper bag.You don’t sign 2 seperate contracts and get boats delivered to your house under standard contracts . You’d be naive to think they all don’t do it but this was different and for him to never address the 2 contracts is what left a bad taste .
I personally believe the judge should have thrown it out, the number of times the defence were able to call out the alleged victim on lying throughout her statement. Makes her look very untrustworthy and lied about the whole thing especially when you're getting bug details wrong.Jury discharged in De Belin trial. I wonder if DPP will go again or discontinue the proceeding?
I personally believe the judge should have thrown it out, the number of times the defence were able to call out the alleged victim on lying throughout her statement. Makes her look very untrustworthy and lied about the whole thing especially when you're getting bug details wrong.
And in other news,The judge can’t throw it out. The judge is essentially a referee at law and will keep both the defence and crown in line, provide a detailed summary and provide advice to the jury on points of law and answer any questions that the jury has. The only way a judge can end a trial without a jury verdict is if there is a mistrial.
I haven’t followed any of the evidence given but if the victim has credibility issues then the judge would have mentioned that to the jury in the summary.
A consent based defence seems easy enough to comprehend but is actually far more complex. Sexual assault trials should be judge only IMO.
https://www.victimsservices.justice...ity of jurors,second trial, with another jury. Based on this a judge can retire a case or if they have sufficient evidence can dismiss the case even on a hung jury. Very rare to happen but still within a judge's role. The judge did end the trial and called a mistrial due to an impassable deadlock with the jury. After two days of deliberation, three times they came back with a deadlock and couldn't even reach a majority (11-1) verdict either.The judge can’t throw it out. The judge is essentially a referee at law and will keep both the defence and crown in line, provide a detailed summary and provide advice to the jury on points of law and answer any questions that the jury has. The only way a judge can end a trial without a jury verdict is if there is a mistrial.
I haven’t followed any of the evidence given but if the victim has credibility issues then the judge would have mentioned that to the jury in the summary.
A consent based defence seems easy enough to comprehend but is actually far more complex. Sexual assault trials should be judge only IMO.
https://www.victimsservices.justice...ity of jurors,second trial, with another jury. Based on this a judge can retire a case or if they have sufficient evidence can dismiss the case even on a hung jury. Very rare to happen but still within a judge's role. The judge did end the trial and called a mistrial due to an impassable deadlock with the jury. After two days of deliberation, three times they came back with a deadlock and couldn't even reach a majority (11-1) verdict either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?