Agree here we go again,
If you didn’t agree with my opinion in my original post, you could’ve kept scrolling, instead, you decided to reply with an incorrect fact saying the judge can’t make that decision. So I provided evidence that a judge could make that decision.
The only thing copied and pasted was the link. You clearly didn’t read what I said. I never suggested the judge throw the case out mid-trial, I said the judge already declared a mistrial, not mid-trial. I even explained why the judge in this particular case called for a mistrial.
If you didn’t agree with my opinion in my original post, you could’ve kept scrolling, instead, you decided to reply with an incorrect fact saying the judge can’t make that decision. So I provided evidence that a judge could make that decision.
The only thing copied and pasted was the link. You clearly didn’t read what I said. I never suggested the judge throw the case out mid-trial, I said the judge already declared a mistrial, not mid-trial. I even explained why the judge in this particular case called for a mistrial.
Last edited: