I do not understand this company's product development.
The Predictor idea is good, but why they couldn't number this to like 50 or something I don't know.
Takes the fun out of everything when you know there'll be 248 other copies of the card (another thing I don't understand about Select; card number #001???), which is way too high.
I will relish the day when Select will do at least something similar to Panini. Stupid, 1:2 pack parallel cards should be replaced with 1:Box numbered parallels or something like that. Which is why I don't collect AFL anymore; with Panini & Upper Deck, I know there'll be lots of fun in my break, and lots of good hits. In Select, the best hit in a case is normally worth $20.
I know this wont make much difference, but numbering parallels is very, very expensive to do.
The issue is that there isn't a lot of people who can do this sort of stuff. If you look at Panini, they have invested in the infrastructure to have a couple of machines that solely do serial numbering (they have the work to keep it fully utilised). In Australia, there isn't a huge need and you would struggle to find someone who could do this for you at a reasonable cost.
It's a bit like collating and packaging cards.....only 1 maybe 2 people who can do it locally here in Australia. There just isn't the scale of work to have people specialising in this type of work.
If you do it, it has to be in big enough quantity to bring down the cost, but for a handful of cards, way too expensive.