Its hard to say, depending on how you look at it, if just the price was the same, it would go up to a 5 or 6, simply because from a case you would be able to make your money back - which is how it should be. The big thing for me is the poor player and poor design, great concepts, just poorly executed, I am not collecting a single card from this year, not that there are many melb storm inserts anyway, but still its pretty disappointing.Interesting read.
If this set was at the same price point as the afl honours 2, what would your thoughts on score be??
To me it's a decent set buy the main restriction on a lot of buyers is price point
As a team collector, I notice the set was too heavy on certain teams and other teams just quads and a signed young gun.
Secondly i would love to see the order of the teams change. So dull starting with Bronco's and ending with the Tigers year after year. How about putting the teams in the order that they finish in the NRL from the previous year just to mix it up a bit?
Vic.
I honestly can't understand the hype over the Mojo Parallels.
At the end of the day it is just another PARALLEL. Most people say they are sick of the parallels but then say they love the Mojo I just don't get it.
The thing that people seem to be happy about is that you get a team set in one pack. So let me ask you this if they changed the gold parallels to a team set in a pack every 2-3 boxes and a silver team set per box would everyone start loving all the parallels?
I think the reason why they go no background is because the cards look more uniform without it.
I have to ask why people are so excited about and paying big dollars for a Mojo set ?
There is 40 sets per team x 16 so that means there is 640 sets out there whereas the Jersey Signatures are only 50 per player.
That's not that limited.
I believe it is due to what brendan has said and also the fact for some teams the mojo pack is the high end insert for there team as they don't have jersey cards, allstar or case cards to chaseI have to ask why people are so excited about and paying big dollars for a Mojo set ?
There is 40 sets per team x 16 so that means there is 640 sets out there whereas the Jersey Signatures are only 50 per player.
That's not that limited.
That also means there are more black league leaders 16 x 50 = 800 out there than mojo sets and we know what they sell for if you can find one.I have to ask why people are so excited about and paying big dollars for a Mojo set ?
There is 40 sets per team x 16 so that means there is 640 sets out there whereas the Jersey Signatures are only 50 per player.
That's not that limited.
yes pleaseGee Dynasty was a cracking release
Anyone want to run a case share???
I personally would love to see 18 cards inc club logo per team. Almost the same players year in year out for a 9 card set. Also then with that many commons just a gold parallel would also suffice. Also how about putting career points on the back as well rather than the same info we normally get.
Secondly i would love to see the order of the teams change. So dull starting with Bronco's and ending with the Tigers year after year. How about putting the teams in the order that they finish in the NRL from the previous year just to mix it up a bit?
Love the quads this year and that they are numbered.
Not keen on the small All Stars / Indigenous subset. Should be a least double (18) if not triple (27) the number of cards for this set out of respect of the representatives.
Nice to see numbered jersey cards as well but if they are to be signed then leave the signed ones for more "elite" player subset.
Finally some of the insert sets are really meaningless over the years. Go back to what Select and Dynamic used to do and introduce a Dally M awards set. At least that subset had some actual relevance. Or even inserting a State of Origin subset rather than selling a smaller seperate series later would be good.
I don't want to "bash" ESP too much as I would dread the day when no-one produces cards for our self absorbing hobby (obsession). But some relevance whether historical and / or statistical in some of the insert subsets would be a breath of fresh air.
This years rating: 7.5/10
Cheers,
Vic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?