Guys, here is the story:
I purchased something on my iphone from an aussie video games online store. Now being on my iPhone and the screen being small, I didn't see that next to the item it said out of stock.
It actually let me add the item to my cart and complete checkout. You beauty!
Then got an email saying it wasnt in stock...so I could now choose between a product of the same value, or 90% refund.
90% refund?! Are you kidding me.
He then refers me to their site policies etc which state they only refund 90% on cancelled orders.
This goes against all consumer protection...surely?!
Especially when I ordered something that he didn't even have in stock, so it's not like he had to send anything or pack anything. He just had to click 'Issue Refund' in Paypal. Yeah fair enough my bad I didn't see it was out of stock, but I was able to add it to my cart and pay for it...what kind of website operates like that?
Anyway I have emailed him saying 90% is competely unacceptable. He then replied referring me again to the policies. I have re-sent one dominating him, and am awaiting reply.
Has anyone been in a situation like this before? Surely it's as dodgy as all heck!
I purchased something on my iphone from an aussie video games online store. Now being on my iPhone and the screen being small, I didn't see that next to the item it said out of stock.
It actually let me add the item to my cart and complete checkout. You beauty!
Then got an email saying it wasnt in stock...so I could now choose between a product of the same value, or 90% refund.
90% refund?! Are you kidding me.
He then refers me to their site policies etc which state they only refund 90% on cancelled orders.
This goes against all consumer protection...surely?!
Especially when I ordered something that he didn't even have in stock, so it's not like he had to send anything or pack anything. He just had to click 'Issue Refund' in Paypal. Yeah fair enough my bad I didn't see it was out of stock, but I was able to add it to my cart and pay for it...what kind of website operates like that?
Anyway I have emailed him saying 90% is competely unacceptable. He then replied referring me again to the policies. I have re-sent one dominating him, and am awaiting reply.
Has anyone been in a situation like this before? Surely it's as dodgy as all heck!