PSA 🔁 KG Hookup

GarnettFan4Life

OZCT Supporter
Feedback - 100%
1262   0   0
Recent returns;


Predicted: 8
Actual: 9
Pop: 4
Higher: 2

2832199.JPG







Predicted: 9
Was: BGS 8 - no subgrades
Actual: 8
Pop: 1
Higher: 2 but mine is jersey numbered

6229275.JPG










Predicted: 9
Actual: 7
Pop: 1
Higher: 0

8805858.JPG







Predicted: 7
Actual: 7
Pop: 1
Higher: 0

8939315.JPG








Predicted: 9
Actual: 9
Pop: 1
Higher: 0

9598615.JPG







Predicted: 9
Actual: 8
Pop: 1
Higher: 0

9747013.JPG







Predicted: 8
Actual: 7
Pop: 1
Higher: 8
Player Specific Pack odds: 1:720

IMG_8355.JPG





TFL :wave:
 
Last edited:
Just giving my eyeballs a few minutes to recover after the topps Gallery Exhibit card. Player specific odds is a new one - so rare cards witha big checklist is the recipe for success there?

Nice pick ups overall mate, although I have warned you previously about grading die cuts! I always thought the Panini Knights were under-priced given their apparent scarcity. Same goes for some of the shorter print National Convention cards.
 
Just giving my eyeballs a few minutes to recover after the topps Gallery Exhibit card. Player specific odds is a new one - so rare cards witha big checklist is the recipe for success there?

Nice pick ups overall mate, although I have warned you previously about grading die cuts! I always thought the Panini Knights were under-priced given their apparent scarcity. Same goes for some of the shorter print National Convention cards.

The Gallery Exhibit is not for everyone - do you like it? I do! Some nice looking other players in that set too

The low numbered and jersey numbered stuff I’m not fussed about grades I just wanted in PSA cases.

With the pack odds yes that seems to be what people do - make it seem more rare with a 300 card set with 1:10 odds = boom super difficult to find 1:3000 for your specific player
 
Back
Top Bottom