nah Chris, they have enough troble getting 1 right when they do them.ESP should really follow the NRL360 model and do 3 cards a week - Week 1 A, B and C.
More interest from team collectors, more cards, more cash.
Maybe a Latrell kangaroo pose one?!How bout a rooster sometime soon
Lock him in how good was he and how good if the cards was thatMaybe a Latrell kangaroo pose one?!
Thanx for your help everyoneIf it is latrell which I think it has to be? Can anyone on here help me out with 2 of his cards please???
Has that GI Tribute PIF gone on sale yet?
no Inglis pic yet
The player in focus cards from last year did have the traders logo on the cards, so for me it does make sense that they are added to the master sets. As for the contradict having limited number cards for me it's no different than all the other cards that are a limited print such as the SAS signatures that say out of 140 ect when there are also extras also being part of a master, however, I would have assumed it would have been the same numbering like all the cards for the master set.Just saw Glenn from goldcost trading has listed a 2018 master set of traders 4/5.
If you look at the pics it has a set of player in focus cards 145.
Seeing how it is a traders master set, how does a pif set become involved and does that not contradict having limited number of cards printed.
ie 17/101 etc.
well done for misleading the card collectors AGAIN TLA.
Another 5 cards of each player out there in the market, even if there numbered different, no wonder you are loosing confidence in the industry.
shonky shonky.
Jaede, see your points, I myself are just pee 'd off with them, I think they are numbered ms4/5, check glenns pics.The player in focus cards from last year did have the traders logo on the cards, so for me it does make sense that they are added to the master sets. As for the contradict having limited number cards for me it's no different than all the other cards that are a limited print such as the SAS signatures that say out of 140 ect when there are also extras also being part of a master, however, I would have assumed it would have been the same numbering like all the cards for the master set.