Broncos vs Cowboys GF 2016
- Thread starter NRL FAN
- Start date
Broncos looked very scratchy but i guess thats now 5 wins in a row against quality teams. Roosters (home), Storm (Amie Park), Dogs (home), Parra (home) and Dragons (Win Stadium) . If the Titans can now beat the Cows we finish in the top 4, K
Last edited:
bigrob2307
OzCardTrader
Quality?
Yes, Storm top of the ladder away, Bulldogs won 5 in a row before we beat them, Parramatta have played well all year no matter who they played and should be in the top 8, and every single team in the current top 8 did not want to play the Roosters on their current form as they should and could beat any team when switched on. Say what you like but even the Dragons at Win Stadium only lost 1 game all year before we beat them at home. So i really think its great winning 5 weeks in a row against those quality teams just before the finals, K.
Parramatta played well until it was found they were over the cap and they had to sell half there side to get back under it, then Foran disappeared. Player roster at the end of the season was nothing like it was at the beginning when they were winning.
Will agree with you on Storm and Bulldogs. Roosters were playing better at the end of the season but players they lost at the end of last year would hardly leave them as the quality side they were last year.
Struggling to score points without Kasiano eating those metres and dominating the ruck. I think Lichaa offers you zero in attack from dummy half and even though Reynolds had a crack the halves do not give the ball to the outside men early enough
It is just Sooo frustrating watching the Bulldogs play. Why cant teams nowadays come up with elaborate set plays like the Parramatta Wall back in the 80's? It just seems to be so much one up hit ups along with the offload here and there. Have to admit, I hate this era of football. I really enjoy watching State of Origin matches from the 90's.
Cowboys will have to beat the Storm for a Broncos v Cowboys Grand Final.
Correct if I'm wrong but I believe for week 2 of the finals the lowest ranked loser from the top 4 (Cowboys if they lose) plays the highest ranking winner (Broncos if they win although if they lose there is no chance of a Cowboys v Broncos Grand Final) from the bottom 4.
Correct if I'm wrong but I believe for week 2 of the finals the lowest ranked loser from the top 4 (Cowboys if they lose) plays the highest ranking winner (Broncos if they win although if they lose there is no chance of a Cowboys v Broncos Grand Final) from the bottom 4.
Victor The Viking
Green Eyed
Absolute disgrace!
I like how the Raiders have said in the press release they will be making no comment on the charge but use this picture. As they say, a picture paints a thousand words...
The only consistent thing about the MRC is that they are inconsistent.
I know Wighton has similar priors, but 3-4 weeks for that is a joke.
Much like the inconsistency around touching a referee.....so many examples of some players being charged and others being overlooked.
The game is becoming a farce.
I know Wighton has similar priors, but 3-4 weeks for that is a joke.
Much like the inconsistency around touching a referee.....so many examples of some players being charged and others being overlooked.
The game is becoming a farce.
I don't believe in the conspiracy theories being thrown about on various Raiders forums but how they can get things so wrong is beyond me.
Wighton cops 20% loading for two non similar priors. The first of which was a great one on one hit on Soward which unfortunately made high contact because Soward was falling (Only Ryan James gets off these) and the second a dubious brush with a touch judge.
Seems that you hit a bloke too hard these days you get punished, dog shot someone and break their back and you don't even get charged.
Wighton is a huge loss and an integral part of everything Canberra.
How about we let the men play footy and punish those who bring the game into disrepute.
I could rant forever over the blatant inconsistencies in our game but what is the point.
Hopefully Canberra brief up to the best QC available and show these morons running our game the difference between a hard hit and an illegal hit
Wighton cops 20% loading for two non similar priors. The first of which was a great one on one hit on Soward which unfortunately made high contact because Soward was falling (Only Ryan James gets off these) and the second a dubious brush with a touch judge.
Seems that you hit a bloke too hard these days you get punished, dog shot someone and break their back and you don't even get charged.
Wighton is a huge loss and an integral part of everything Canberra.
How about we let the men play footy and punish those who bring the game into disrepute.
I could rant forever over the blatant inconsistencies in our game but what is the point.
Hopefully Canberra brief up to the best QC available and show these morons running our game the difference between a hard hit and an illegal hit
Similar threads
