Official ESP 2016 NRL Traders Thread (Sell Sheet Page 14)

[Brendan_B]

Titans signature modified to Lachlan BURR as "confirmed"

Índications elsewhere that there might be well and truly more than 100 per player which would throw my one per case theory out the window. Time will tell!

Where are all you twitter, instagram and other social media forum stalkers? We need some more info!

 

[3bet]

I just wish ESP would come to the party and give us some info earlier!

 

[The Mad Hatter]

No offence - Lachlan Burr?

I'm a GC member and even I didn't know him!

 

[Brendan_B]

Certainly a low profile but a promising back rower. I think he might have been a dogs junior.

It would have been hard to get a higher profile signer with all that was happening at the Titans, I thought Hoffman would have been the go.

 

[RisingSun]

did I hear somewhere that Traders will have foil signature insert as well ? I may have dreamt it, I hope so cause they are the worst.

 

[3bet]

did I hear somewhere that Traders will have foil signature insert as well ? I may have dreamt it, I hope so cause they are the worst.

I just vomited in my mouth!

 

[Brendan_B]

did I hear somewhere that Traders will have foil signature insert as well ? I may have dreamt it, I hope so cause they are the worst.

I hadn't heard that....yet.....

Bucket Jarrod?

 

[3bet]

Didn't the last AFL release have foil sigs?

 

[Brendan_B]

Didn't the last AFL release have foil sigs?

Yeah but they were only available via redemption of the codes you obtained from the cards. I think you could win some on line or just get the right codes.

I am not sure if they were numbered but I believe they were /100 and looked quite good. Initially they caused a stir because it wasn't clarified that they were foil signatures (I think)

 

[3bet]

Yeah but they were only available via redemption of the codes you obtained from the cards. I think you could win some on line or just get the right codes.

I am not sure if they were numbered but I believe they were /100 and looked quite good. Initially they caused a stir because it wasn't clarified that they were foil signatures (I think)

Well we will never get clarification till release day, cause ESP give nothing away.

 

[Brendan_B]

Well we will never get clarification till release day, cause ESP give nothing away.

And I just don't understand this logic. Sure keep some information locked away until release but I really liked what TapnPlay did with the cricket release by posting a picture of the players signing every week or so.

This can only generate excitement and therefore sell more product.

 

[Parrapaul]

And I just don't understand this logic. Sure keep some information locked away until release but I really liked what TapnPlay did with the cricket release by posting a picture of the players signing every week or so.

This can only generate excitement and therefore sell more product.

Agreed there mate

Should of release 1 or 2 per week from the start of the year to get it fever pitch just before the cards come out

 

[Brendan_B]

Didn't the last AFL release have foil sigs?

Stole this info from the AFL forum

I am sure that you are all aware by now that Select have decided to release a limited set of Captain Signature cards in conjunction with the Apple App. Basically you have to collect all 20 of the digital Captain Signature cards to be able to redeem a set (150 only) or be one of the lucky ones to pull a digital redemption card (50 only). The sets are individually numbered from 1-200 and each digital card is suggested to be in the ration of 1:36 much like the superhero box cards.

 

[3bet]

Stole this info from the AFL forum

I am sure that you are all aware by now that Select have decided to release a limited set of Captain Signature cards in conjunction with the Apple App. Basically you have to collect all 20 of the digital Captain Signature cards to be able to redeem a set (150 only) or be one of the lucky ones to pull a digital redemption card (50 only). The sets are individually numbered from 1-200 and each digital card is suggested to be in the ration of 1:36 much like the superhero box cards.

They actually don't look to bad.

 

[Brendan_B]

They actually don't look to bad.

I thought so too. If foul signatures are well presented they could be okay. Need to be 1 per box

 

[Diggaz TC]

I believe so but it depends on the production run. I could be wrong but 15 Traders was about 21,000 boxes?

If so that would be 18 signatures so one per team and two more

2015 Traders was closer to a 25,000 run once you factored in stock broken up.

2016 Traders is expected to be closer to 20,000.

18 Signatures does make sense if those are the numbers.

 

[hobo]

I thought so too. If foul signatures are well presented they could be okay. Need to be 1 per box

Foul signatures

In all seriousness I think they look OK as an addition to a release but would not be happy if they came as a replacement to in person hand signed originals.

Ross

 

[Brendan_B]

Foul...damn autocorrect!

One sig per team then one each NSW & QLD!!

 

[Parrapaul]

I thought you meant foul sig cards like Lachlan burr

 

[Parrapaul]

What's the bet on the sell sheet they have the slater sig card pictured