I have to say this decision left me more than a little...confused.
I mean no disrespect to Korver - the man obviously has some game and no question he's big a big part of Atlanta's success...but Korver is averaging 13 Points, 4 rebounds and 2.5 assists this year in about 33 minutes and he's not exactly known for being an elite defender (which often gets overlooked). Are they really star (let alone All-Star) numbers?
In the east you have guys like:
Nikola Vucevic (19 pts, 11 reb)
Tobias Harris (17.4 pts, 6.6 reb, 2 ast, 1 stl)
Greg Monroe (15.4 pts, 10.5 reb, 2 ast)
Al Jefferson (17.5 pts, 8.5 reb, 1.3 blk)
Joe Johnson (15.6 pts, 4.5 reb, 3.7 ast)
Brook Lopez (15.4 pts, 6.2 reb, 1.7 blk)
Jared Sullinger (14.4 pts, 8 reb, 2.4 ast)
Andre Drummond (12.6 pts, 13 reb, 1.8 blk, 1 stl)
Surely you woudl have to think just about every player on that list has had better individual seasons then Korver has? I just can't help but feel the only reason Korver has been voted to the team this year is because the Hawks have the best record in the East, and so he is the token "extra Hawks guy". Considering he is essentially a one-dimensional role player (his only really great talent is his shooting ability) there is no way he's an All-Star calibre player! Making him an All-Star would be somewhat like making Steve Kerr an All-Star in the Jordan days...or making Derek Fisher an All-Star in 2009. I just don't get it.
Again I have to reiterate that I have nothing at all against Korver, he's obviously great at what he does (much like Battier was on defence) but I just always believed that All-Star is supposed to be about individual achievements rather than how good your team is.