If that's the case, I'd assume select would find a way to to create some consolation redemption via social media notification should an unexpected player become a Brownlow prospect?
Or in second thoughts maybe there will be a wildcard but it's just not mentioned on the checklist. Think the packets said 144 in past years when there were technically 145
Or in second thoughts maybe there will be a wildcard but it's just not mentioned on the checklist. Think the packets said 144 in past years when there were technically 145
So if, as per the face of Select, the TD starbursts are lower numbered than the blacks last year that must mean the BPs are lower as well as the actual number in the set remains essentially the same.
So if, as per the face of Select, the TD starbursts are lower numbered than the blacks last year that must mean the BPs are lower as well as the actual number in the set remains essentially the same.
The sell sheet was listed on the previous page and it seems to be, but I'm not certain, that the Gold BPs are numbered to /235 and the Platinum BPs are numbered to /45, lower than last year.
The sell sheet was listed on the previous page and it seems to be, but I'm not certain, that the Gold BPs are numbered to /235 and the Platinum BPs are numbered to /45, lower than last year.
lol every year the gold coast have been ahead of gws yet this year gws are ahead of gold coast hahha they are using giants in order to gauge alphabetical order. How random
lol every year the gold coast have been ahead of gws yet this year gws are ahead of gold coast hahha they are using giants in order to gauge alphabetical order. How random
Hmmmm maybe for a few reasons: 1) they play home games in Canberra as well as Sydney so kinda like in the early 00s when north were simply know as the Kangas
2) the letter W is 3 sylabols and in this case acronym GWS doesn't speed up speech very well: perhaps you could say g-west-s instead but people thing you're weird if that's your perceptive collective instead of g-double-you-es LoL