TMac logoman

Status
Not open for further replies.

bigsarg7

OzCardTrader
Feedback - 100%
14   0   0
Just saw this auction but I don't think I would be paying $700+ for this. I hope they read the auction description properly.

This rare card has the NBA logoman and AUTO AND HAS A PRINT RUN OF ONE IN BECKETT

It doesn't have 1/1 stamped on the back of it either
 
sweet card.. but i thought t-mac doesn't really write that properly in his signature???

would love to have one t-mac auto in my collection..
 
no numbering, obvious fake auto, sideays logoman (im pretty sure no cards have ever put a sideways logoman, correct me if im wrong).

very obvious fake.
 
:lol:

funniest auction I've seen in ages.

sideays logoman (im pretty sure no cards have ever put a sideways logoman, correct me if im wrong).

yeah that's right, and if it doesn't fit they cut into halves or quarters to fit it in upright.
 
When I saw it I thought it looked pretty silly with the logoman sideways. Still can't beleive someone has bid $700 for it
 
Hey guys,

Sadly, I have to let you know of the truth. Such card do exist from this Court Authentics set, however, it must have a serial stamping of 1/1 at the back of the card per usual.

As a matter of fact, I am after the Allen Iverson one that I have seen but not very sure who may own such a beast.

Kidsensasian, a big collector of Chris Bosh in the US own one for his collection; obviously of a Chris Bosh.

I do have a sideways logoman as well that I acquired awhile back now. I think it was before the Fleer auctions thingo happened.

So in conclusion, I personally this card is a fake because of the non-visible serial number (1/1) at the back of the card but such card do exist, so player collectors, keep your eyes open.

04-05_Fleer-Sweet-Sigs_Hardcourt-1.jpg



Cheers,


-Hendra
 
The Logoman version of that card should have a sideway logo and at that exact location. Ive seen the real Wade one of that card and personally Im not a big fan of the layout.

Regarding that card questions have to be asked with the lack of serial numbering and the seller not mentioning anything regarding serial (going by "beckett lists it as 1/1)
Id say it was a "modified Fleer Archieval Proof"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom