Thoughts on these custom cards.

Mr Paparazzi

Adelaide's MOJO maker

Feedback - 100%

363   0   0

• Aug 15, 2014

• #1

Been a few different types of custom cards from players like Dante Exum, Nerlens Noel etc

A few simple very poorly made ones but also some very nice refractor type 1/1 showing up too.

What are you thoughts on them?

I am personally a fan of the higher quality ones and is no different to the hundreds of different parallels Panini has been producing as of late.

 

Mr Paparazzi

Adelaide's MOJO maker

Feedback - 100%

363   0   0

• Aug 16, 2014

• #2

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dante-Exum-...55589697?pt=US_Basketball&hash=item20e9732041

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dante-Exum-...05016868?pt=US_Basketball&hash=item1c444d8b24

This one looks very nice!

 

ozballer23

#1 J.R. Smith Collector

Feedback - 100%

740   0   0

• Aug 17, 2014

• #3

I wouldn't buy one, but I don't have a problem if the card as a WHOLE is custom made, however I am fully against any card that has used an existing card that has had the swatch replaced by a custom made patch. At some point of that cards life in the future, the fact that the patch is custom made will be loss and some clown will claim it as legit.

 

nenjabin

World's #1 Pat Burke Collector

Feedback - 100%

157   0   0

• Aug 17, 2014

• #4

I'm a hardcore player collector...but I'd ignore these completely if they were my player. The 1/1 looks passable, the 9/10 looks downright cheap. I don't know...I guess it's alright if they are entirely custom like Norm said but I wouldn't think twice about ignoring them.

 

wjrwebber

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

127   0   0

• Aug 17, 2014

• #5

Can't believe the money being spent on them, people have rocks in their head!

 

nichj99

Faried PC Battle Champion

Feedback - 100%

231   0   0

• Aug 17, 2014

• #6

I believe the Future Stock card manufacturer is in some legal trouble for using images owned by a South Australian Photographer without permission or royalties being paid.

Copyright Law says that an image can be used if it is altered by a minimum of 90% (the tough part to answer is, how do you prove it is 90% different) or if it is not for commercial purposes as long as approval is given from the owner.

The second one is a lot nicer but I still wouldn't personally buy into it.

 

Mr Paparazzi

Adelaide's MOJO maker

Feedback - 100%

363   0   0

• Aug 17, 2014

• #7

Yeah personally not a big fan of Future Stock cards but Primer ones looks nicer. Especially the refractor ones.

Dont agree with using fake patches and stuff though just talking about normal base cards.