Boston
#1 in Opponent’s FG%: .404
#1 in Opponent’s PPG: 90.47
#2 in Opponent’s APG: 17.47
#3 in Point differential: 8.29
#3 in Opponent’s Fouls: 24.47
#5 in FG%: .467
#5 in Opponent’s TO’s: 15.94
#6 in Steals Per Game: 8.47
#8 in RPG: 43.05
#8 in Opponent’s RPG: 40.11
#6 in Opponent’s BPG: 4.00
#9 in BPG: 5.47
#10 in APG: 21.00
The only 2 overwhelming weaknesses they’ve had this season are TO’s: 5th most in the league at 16 per game, and committing fouls: 3rd most in the league at 23.35 per game. The upside? See above – their opponents commit so many fouls and TO’s that everything evens out…
Another fact: When opponents score 100+ points per game the Celts are 4-0… They'll still outscore you.
Mate you're not a troll, you're just a one eyed, faker hating, Smeltic fan!
Anyway, we got it done... Averaging 117 points for and 92 points against, the best record in the NBA. The defense doesn't always show up consistently but the dubs are stacking up and the offense is just too much, even when Kobe is off. That's the special thing about the Lakers in 2008/09 and that's the Laker team I'm loving the most out of the last 4 seasons. Letting them over 100 shows we failed in a sense, too true. Would love it if we we were 100% consistent on both ends and that will come throughout the season but right now all that matters is W's, we've got 6 straight - hopefully another coming when we host the Raps next week!
The proof is in the pudding;
ESPN - NBA Basketball Statistics and League Leaders - National Basketball Association
We're outscoring the Celtics, we're holding teams to the same scoring average, we are outrebounding on both ends, we are getting more steals and last but not least.... we have the better record.
The proof is in the puddingStats don't lie...97% of people agree with that
Did you watch the game Marcus??
Sorry but your boys were terrible today. Must of been the knicks depth. All 7 players LOL
yeah we had a win like that the other day. Terrible game but still a W.
And the Knicks ran out of gas in the end and took some bad looks. They actually cracked a little. With 7 players you can't blame them. They weren't really Lakers stops. One of the last plays Lee got hammered and no call where he would of put the Knick ahead 5pts from memory.
I gotta agree with you here, I didn't see the game but kept checking the scores. For a Knicks team with 7 players to give us that much of a run is unacceptable, with or without Pau. It's early days but our defense is showing alot of cracks, it's back to simply outscoring and bench impact. They've slacked off compared to the first 10 games, so much so that we win games were expected to lose and lose games we should be closing out. They gotta get consistently hungry again. I believe we'll keep the top seed in the west, but you can't be simply content with that, no matter how ungreatful that sounds.
Maybe a little early to worry, but I'm seeing some bad trends in the last 10 odd games.
Andrew what are your thoughts on the Odom trade whisper??
I think the reason for Phil starting Walton is get more defensive and passing productivity from that point....But other than that i have no idea why he is starting??He has no Low-Mid Range game he can run the breaks but thats pretty much it...
Gasol did play against the Heat..But i think your right Odom and Gasol my be ssufffering from a virus....
Today Odom stunk it up basically and Gasol just can't get it done when he is man handled. The Lakers were propped up by the Magic's poor free throw shooting otherwise this wouldn't have been close. Fisher kept you in the game.
Famar is out for at least 6 weeks with torn meniscus.
Kobe only really got the one FG in the last from memory and the Magic did a good job of making him give it up early on in the possession.
Jackson challegned Odom to give him something and it just doesn't happen. After the finals last year and from What I've seen in watching games its no wonder fans are tuning against him.
The lakers copped some breaks with calls and Kobe travelling twice in the final minutes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?