That's how I interpret it. Interesting to see people in the media that wanted some of these changes made now complaining about them.I dont entirely get this new DRS. If Given out ball must be completely missing to be given not out but if given not out ball only has to just be hitting any part rather than completely hitting?
Certainly concerning to see umpires seriously considering LBWs to players advancing down the pitch.Saw a reply of marsh getting out and that is the one that stumped me.
I didnt mind the old way.
Smith being given out halfway down the pitch was pathetic. No reward for being aggressive and using your feet if this is the road they take
How about Ferguson at 6Shaun Marsh is out injured, Voges monitoring
Burns and Callum Ferguson added to squad. Be assuming Burns to open
How about Ferguson at 6
We need to stop wasting time with picking an all rounder, it's not working!!!!
100% robStraight out batsman not another all rounder?
I don't think it will be long before he and Chadd Sayers are amongst our frontline fast bowlers in the Test team. Happy for Joe Mennie to get an opportunity - 161 First Class wickets at 26.88 is a bloody good record. I prefer to see experience and consistency rewarded as opposed to throwing a young lamb to the slaughter.Joe Mennie isn't even a third change bowler. FMD, our playing stocks are so, so very thin.
I don't think it will be long before he and Chadd Sayers are amongst our frontline fast bowlers in the Test team. Happy for Joe Mennie to get an opportunity - 161 First Class wickets at 26.88 is a bloody good record. I prefer to see experience and consistency rewarded as opposed to throwing a young lamb to the slaughter.
Perhaps I'm stupid (and enough evidence exists to support the premise!!) but would it not simply be a matter of swapping the batting positions of Peter Nevill and Mitchell Marsh? We have see Nev stuck with the tail as far back as in Adelaide against New Zealand last season and he is more of an industrious, steady batsman than one who can thrash bowling with the tail batting around him. I am astounded - particularly as they want the kid to do his share of bowling too - that this hasn't happened.Very disappointed with the dropping of Mitch Marsh after the selectors' comments last week. That's one way to ruin his confidence.
I think marsh's record speaks for itself, 17 test innings without a 50.Very disappointed with the dropping of Mitch Marsh after the selectors' comments last week. That's one way to ruin his confidence.
Completely agree - that swap probably should have happened during the Perth Test at the latest. Would suit both players better.Perhaps I'm stupid (and enough evidence exists to support the premise!!) but would it not simply be a matter of swapping the batting positions of Peter Nevill and Mitchell Marsh? We have see Nev stuck with the tail as far back as in Adelaide against New Zealand last season and he is more of an industrious, steady batsman than one who can thrash bowling with the tail batting around him. I am astounded - particularly as they want the kid to do his share of bowling too - that this hasn't happened.
Not quite true - he scored one 4 innings ago versus Sri Lanka. And I wasn't debating whether or not he is deserving of his spot; I was saying that after the comments the selectors made last week about Marsh definitely having at least one more Test, it is very poor to then drop him immediately.I think marsh's record speaks for itself, 17 test innings without a 50.
He's lucky to last as long as he has
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?