Redemption GOODNESS

bruntyblue

bruntyblue

Feedback - 100%

179   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #1

Well kudo's to Select, posted these of last Wednesday 08-08-12 and they arrived back today.

First up 3D screamers



Next my 2000 Y2K Caydn Beetham (St Kilda) Draft Pick Signature Redemption #620/800
(only set of DPS via redemption)



and the Main one here

2012 Eternity Coleman Medal Signature Card #046/200 Lance Franklin

Comments welcome

 

boofhead

Hawthorn Card Collector

Feedback - 100%

64   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #2

You got the Buddy redemption back quick mate.
Ive sent mine away, It looks as buddys done a bit of a rush job on these sigs.
You think he would of signed in the right spot in the white section rather than across
the whole card, spose they are qualified only to pay football.
It will be good to see scans of Dyson Heppell and the Dane Swan redemption.

 

banana

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

184   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #3

Buddy's Sig = shocking

 

BLOWN8

Such is life!

Feedback - 100%

132   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #4

Im with you guys, sadly i think it has spoilt an awesome card, to make it worse hawks fans have waited for this card for a long time now and this is what we get. how could buddy do this to us

 

ShueyGaffDarlingNat

Eagles Collector & AFL Connoisseur

Feedback - 100%

189   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #5

Say it isn't so Buddy. I feel so gutted for Hawks fans right now. What a lazy prick.

 

LASWEET

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

61   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #6

Yeah that is a pretty poor effort from Buddy. Surely it can't be that hard to sign a card in the designated area?

 

ElkyJnr

Banned User

Feedback - 100%

141   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #7

I have heard the others arent much better either...

either way it looks great in the master set

 

K

kingjack

Dane Swan super collector.

Feedback - 100%

272   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #8

Look on the bright side you have a massive, clean and legible signature. Beats the hell out of some of other signature's i've seen.

 

bruntyblue

bruntyblue

Feedback - 100%

179   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #9

Yeah looks slightly faded in scan, BUT IT'S NOT haha, looks good in hand, my first thought was "what the" but the more I look at it the more I like it

 

Lazlow

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

123   0   0

• Aug 17, 2012

• #10

Still yet to send my Swan in, hope its a better sig than that.

 

boofhead

Hawthorn Card Collector

Feedback - 100%

64   0   0

• Aug 18, 2012

• #11

bruntyblue said:

Yeah looks slightly faded in scan, BUT IT,S NOT haha, looks good in hand, my first thought was "what the" but the more I look at it the more I like it

Click to expand...

As long as you like it Rob thats the main thing mate.
Spose it will grow on me.
It will be interesting to see if he starts signing in the right place
after he finally works it out.
Sort of like Max Baileys DPS cards after sig #270

 

T

TAB1980

OZCT Supporter

Feedback - 100%

41   0   0

• Aug 23, 2012

• #12

I'm with you Boofhead. I have #198. Hopefully someone had a word in his ear before then.

 

BLOWN8

Such is life!

Feedback - 100%

132   0   0

• Aug 23, 2012

• #13

boofhead said:

As long as you like it Rob thats the main thing mate.
Spose it will grow on me.
It will be interesting to see if he starts signing in the right place
after he finally works it out.
Sort of like Max Baileys DPS cards after sig #270

Click to expand...

yeah took me ages to find a max bailey sig in the right spot. chris obst did the same thing in 1998, that one also took some tracking down. nearly all the buddy signatures ive seen he signed them on an angle, not just these cards, so maybe he needed to turn the card slightly so his signature was on the white area and straight.