Understand your frustration aussie but I dislike the sentiment that members have with statements like "the things people will do to win" or "winning is everything to them".
People just play different ways, and most people would enjoy the way they play. I think that's the bottom line.
Need a reset on Grizz vs Suns dropped out in the first 1/4.
He even had the nerve to message me and tell me it always happens against me? WTF every game he plays disconnects!
Mate, seriously, how the hell can people enjoying going to the basket 80% plus of the time?!? Thats a load of crap IMO! People like MattBowne and Swish only want too win! Apparently swish does nothing but isolate with Jackson or Brown and will literally run in circles until he can get to the basket and dunk, but when Digeze played a practice game he played totally different!?! You can't tell me thats not all about winning! MattBowen ONLY uses Iggy and Kobe! He does not go to anyone else more then a couple of time a game! he was even passing on open shots in the paint with Lopez!
But, there is people like yourself and a couple of others that score alot in the paint or close to but at least you use shots not just dunks and layups!
If you honestly think there isn't a handful of members out of the 30 that only want to win, then, IMO, your delusional!
While we do have a fairly good mix of players in the league there is at least 2 or 3 that don't care about anything but winning and it is shown in the way they play the game. You can not ignore the obvious!
Mmm I suppose your right. Those 2-3 members I guess you are dead on about.
Anyway mods can you please put through my two trades. Been waiting all day as I don't wanna play a new game till I've got them on my squad. Cheers.
Trades are under review. There are concerns about James' feelings on playing since he's not been about much lately and he appears to be blowing up his team with really uneven trades.
I am aware of this as he said he'd send me Kidd, Pierce and others for my worst players. I replied and said no that wouldn't be fair, then sent a trade which was even in ratings (the 6-player deal).
So with that being said, there shouldn't be a reason why the trades don't go through as they are fair and even completely balanced in rating points.
I am aware of this as he said he'd send me Kidd, Pierce and others for my worst players. I replied and said no that wouldn't be fair, then sent a trade which was even in ratings (the 6-player deal).
So with that being said, there shouldn't be a reason why the trades don't go through as they are fair and even completely balanced in rating points.
Ok so now you've confirmed it. Michael and I were just guessing that this was the case, now you've told us it is the case. In my opinion, I'm not sure how Michael would feel about this, but ANY trade with him now should not be allowable, ratings perceived to be equal or not. Simply because he doesn't actually give a damn who he gets in return, and if we're going to get a new owner, they deserve to have the say on whether they would make the trade or not.
That's my thoughts, we'll see what Michael says also.
I think if he has made it clear he is no longer interested and is perfectly happy to blow up the team then it would be unfair to approve ANY trade involving his team. Why should he get a say on any trade if he isn't going to play the game. Any further trades would be at the discrection of the new Dallas Mavericks owner.
When/where has he made it clear he is perfectly happy to blow up the team?
Jason Kidd / Paul Pierce trade offer for your crappiest players would be considered a pretty obvious indication.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?