I think last year's duels were better.The better dual sigs still fetch $600 and I feel there's better dual signatures this time around.
Yep alot of just ablett collectors whoa rent Gold Coast Collectors. So they will want the card without ainsworth. I for one am stoked to have both!As both numbered to 50 (if I’ve read things correctly)…can see Ablett signature going for more than Ablett and Ainsworth dual signature is one of the examples I refer to. Anyways time will tell…can’t wait. Will be expensive though
I feel it’s a missed opportunity with the Footy’s Finest. Scott Pendlebury, Patrick Cripps, Zach Merrett, Joel Selwood, Travis Boak and Jack Riewoldt would have been far better choices for those clubs.
That’s a good point I forgot about those. Not giving Scott Pendlebury a Footy’s Finest card was a huge mistake since he doesn’t have an Influential.Cant back this up with facts but maybe they tried to pick players different to the Influential cards, maybe.
That’s a good point I forgot about those. Not giving Scott Pendlebury a Footy’s Finest card was a huge mistake since he doesn’t have an Influential.
Fair call. That's why I said cant back it up with facts haha, as I didn't actually check who had Influentials. Cant believe Pendles doesn't have an Influential.
A ebay sale from the last week makes for a interesting comparison of what is of "value" in the football card collecting world , The player in question was perhaps the greatest of all time holds a record which most likely will never be beaten you can watch 1000 of hrs on Youtube of his highlights.The Card sale in question was the 1985 Scanlens "Rookie" card # 119 of Tony Lockett , now in what must be said looked to be NM condition and it sold for 386 Now my long winded point is would you rather spend 386 on a proven bonafide superstar or 600 for a box of 2022 Optimum
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/MINT-ANTHONY-TONY-LOCKETT-ROOKIE-ST-KILDA-1985-SCANLENS-VFL-CARD-119-/204096452514?nma=true&si=vDkHxrmaqstUBatuxEQ5LqW9Z2s%3D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
I would agree if he didn't just have a gold brilliance. It is weird that he hasn't had a influential thoughThat’s a good point I forgot about those. Not giving Scott Pendlebury a Footy’s Finest card was a huge mistake since he doesn’t have an Influential.
I would agree if he didn't just have a gold brilliance. It is weird that he hasn't had a influential though
A ebay sale from the last week makes for a interesting comparison of what is of "value" in the football card collecting world , The player in question was perhaps the greatest of all time holds a record which most likely will never be beaten you can watch 1000 of hrs on Youtube of his highlights.The Card sale in question was the 1985 Scanlens "Rookie" card # 119 of Tony Lockett , now in what must be said looked to be NM condition and it sold for 386 Now my long winded point is would you rather spend 386 on a proven bonafide superstar or 600 for a box of 2022 Optimum
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/MINT-ANTHONY-TONY-LOCKETT-ROOKIE-ST-KILDA-1985-SCANLENS-VFL-CARD-119-/204096452514?nma=true&si=vDkHxrmaqstUBatuxEQ5LqW9Z2s%3D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
Shit, I'm putting mine up tonight.I wouldn't spend $600 on a box of Optimum, I think that's a terrible move whether you're trying to make money or even just to have fun busting packs.
$386 on that card isn't even a debate for me, it's a clear no because it's not to my taste design wise. I loved Lockett, but I wouldn't spend that much money on that card. I'd want something better for my money looks wise. However, that price seems off to me. There are now 3 others on eBay for auction, let's see what those do.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?