Yes agree, get the past players signing. Not sure how it works now the are just joe citizen and use of their image in team colours.There's too much in person autos in the hobby. It's great for kids but much of this stuff finds its way onto ebay. Some of it will sadly be counterfeit such is human nature. If I were a criminal I'd spend the next few months perfecting the signatures of greats. It must be a piece of cake really. As the hobby grows here there could be a niche for authenticating and slabbing in person autos. Something that is I believe not currently done. If it is let me know because I would like to get a few done.
Need way more licensed autos in our local sports.
For sure. I've not been a team collector since I was a kid so I'm hoping to hit something, anything to offset the overall cost. I'm really a set collector at heart. The most joy I get is looking through a binder rather than going through a box of toploaders or graded cards.Yes 1 per box would be great. It's all comes down to maths. The number of cases they think they can sell, divided by the
number of signature cards and ratios they are using.
Thing is most collectors seem to be team collectors now , so if you don't get your team at least you want a
good chance of moving it on or trade for the one you want.
Yes, there is something nice about looking through the older cards (pre 1994) where there were no inserts. Just common cards and plentyFor sure. I've not been a team collector since I was a kid so I'm hoping to hit something, anything to offset the overall cost. I'm really a set collector at heart. The most joy I get is looking through a binder rather than going through a box of toploaders or graded cards.
Value is important as it really is expensive relative to what it is - cardboard. Most mums and dads would not be that stoked to have their kids pestering them for $200 boxes of cards when the cost of living has gone through the roof.
There's a lot of subsets going on. Then variants on them, but that's the way now. Only 2 sigs, not a team that I thought I saw a picture of. As I've mentioned before the design is too busy for me. Sigs # to 39 and 106, please just stick to nice rounded numbers. If it means ratios are better, all good. I do hope that all these subsets do standout apart from one another. Only 8 players is too low for my liking. In my mind the top 13/15 players in each squad should make on to a card over the two releases. Well that's my quick take on the release, now wait to see the checklist at months end. [/QUOTEAnother 10 years down the track and we might be chasing 30 card rainbows.
Who will but this standalone NRLW product if the consensus is it’s cluttering up the NRL sets?If you're willing to pay up like you would for one of the men's sigs I'm all yours.
Otherwise I'll hang onto it and donate it to a local NRLW club.
I'm no sexist - just in case someone mistakes me for that - it's just that you can't get around the fact that the sigs of the women will, all things equal, go for less than the fellas as their market is so much smaller. I feel like I'm subsidising the cards of the NRLW in these products.
TLA should be doing most of the heavy lifting - ie stand alone NRLW product - I'm not a wealthy man and I would like more value. Not less value.
Edit: Sorry mate, got a bit loose there. I'd be happy to sell it to you for the going rate. Cheers.
8 commons per team is ridiculous. Should be minimum 12-15. The cricket stuff is getting down to 9 commons for the test team when it was 15-16 a couple years back.Yes, there is something nice about looking through the older cards (pre 1994) where there were no inserts. Just common cards and plenty
of them from each team. But that was 30 years ago, things move on like my hair
It's tricky. I'm all for the actual women's sports side of things but my beef is with TLA and that there is too much women's content in relation to the size of the market and it means me Joe Bloggs is subsidising it.Who will but this standalone NRLW product if the consensus is it’s cluttering up the NRL sets?
Honestly, knowing women making their way in, or playing NRWL or WBBL, it’s absolutely fantastic the women’s content is included. At any time, folks don’t want it, hit me up.
On another note, I’m working in a primary school, if serious case collectors have commons they don’t want, let me know. I’ll put them in to sets to hand out to the kids at my school. A lot of little RL fans would be very appreciative.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?