number or sig

Darrenemu

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

40   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #1

Hi all, just saw Dave sell a hindmarsh and i assume he has another one still.
My question is if people have 2 of a premium card and wish to get rid of one (and both in mint cond) do u always keep the smaller number or pick which signature looks best to keep? or is this just a silly question?
Darren

 

ch0pzta

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

71   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #2

I pondered this very question a few weeks ago, would people favour a better sig with a high number or a low numbered card with lower quality signature?

You always see "LOW NUMBER" on sig listings, but never "GREAT QUALITY SIGNATURE"

 

Wizzle

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

90   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #3

If we all graded cards like in the US the quality of the sig would be a big factor

 

1967Sharks

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

99   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #4

I consider 9 or under low. So if i had #38 and #72, I would definitely keep the better sig.

 

GiRDS-

Collecting UFC Bobbleheads

Feedback - 100%

200   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #5

unless it was a jersey numbered i wouldn't care

 

ooneil

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

141   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #6

Definitely the better sig. Everytime. Especially when your looking at sigs that have come direct from packets.

Rather have a #290 clean and not scratched sig rather than a #20 scratched sig.

 

the game rugby league

OZCT Supporter

Feedback - 100%

51   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #7

Good Question Personally number only if it is number 2

 

Tanswell87

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

16   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #8

When I got rid of my second Lockyer sig the signature was slightly better on the card numberd 20 odd but I was never going to get rid of the 002 for a slightly better sig.

 

orsum12

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

2   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #9

I recently sold a couple of captain signatures Norton and Betham because I brought a nearly complete captains set all the same number I have to say the Norton signature I sold was a nicer looking signature than the 1 I kept, it's just the fact they it's a part of 9 captain cards i have that are all the same number.

 

1967Sharks

OzCardTrader

Feedback - 100%

99   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #10

orsum12 said:

I recently sold a couple of captain signatures Norton and Betham because I brought a nearly complete captains set all the same number I have to say the Norton signature I sold was a nicer looking signature than the 1 I kept, it's just the fact they it's a part of 9 captain cards i have that are all the same number.

Click to expand...

Ohh you have to scan those up. Out of curiousity, what number?

 

Noark-99

One Day! Cowboys!

Feedback - 100%

167   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #11

orsum12 said:

I recently sold a couple of captain signatures Norton and Betham because I brought a nearly complete captains set all the same number I have to say the Norton signature I sold was a nicer looking signature than the 1 I kept, it's just the fact they it's a part of 9 captain cards i have that are all the same number.

Click to expand...

Yes.... Yes.... The Norton was a very good sig!!! and for me.. Being a cowboys collector.... I always go for a better sig!!

What number are all yours?!

M.

 

Matt26

OZCT Supporter

Feedback - 100%

101   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #12

Id always go for the better signature, unless its jersey numbered.

 

hobo

Kogarah to Kiama

OZCT Supporter

Feedback - 100%

300   0   0

• Apr 10, 2013

• #13

ditto...........better signature