Same thing happened last year when Parra vs Melbourne in the 1st round, we had momentum and a try was disallowed. I can't see how they can **** up a decision with video replay.
i'm not really a fan of either team, but i was Happy with both of Inu's "No Try" decisions.
his foot was on the line before he got the ball down!! it was worth giving just for his effort, but you can't deviate from the rules 'just because'!!
i honestly believe the Tahu high tackle/head slam on Falou was the turning point in the game!! The Eels were still in the game up until then, but the try not long after that penalty was the killer!! it was a shame too cos Tahu was one of their better players today!!
Very disappointing , no benefit of the doubt , all 50-50's went to storm.
They have been the best team all year but a few decisions helped them over the line.
The first was a no try, no denying that. However, there wasn't substantial evidence to say his foot actually touched the line on the 2nd. The replays weren't convincing enough and there wasn't any reason not to give the benefit of the doubt. Would it have changed the outcome of the game? Who knows..