My opinion is that ratios do not dictate the value of a card. I would much rather 2 Tps than a Double Trouble. I would swap any DT for any 2 TPs and someone offering 1 TP for a DT isnt that bad of a proposal. Look at Ebay completed listings, it isnt totally fair but it is in the ballpark.
If that deal has got you thinking that people here are vultures, stay a while and that deal will almost seem fair.
If i had Idris TP, i would never even straight trade that for a Dragons DT.
Seriously whats better, an up and coming stars signature rookie card or a piece of plastic that is just a recycled idea from series 1?
Thats just my thoughts and im sure i will be in the minority here
You know the thing about low ball offers from 'scam artists'. They get rejected and no one but the few that don't know their thing, consult someone or do their homework get the short end of the stick.
Those that low ball don't trade very often and simply are a nuisance and are quickly known in the community as those you are less likely to trade with.
Easy answer to the whole thing is a simple no and move on.
Totally agree, who cares about numbers, Top Prospects are signed, look better than the Double Troubles (which I reckon look quite ugly for some teams) and the numbers aren't that different.
But anyway, if you don't like the deal being offered then just say no, and get over it! No use crying about it, nobody is forcing you to take any deal on here.
Just because top prospects are signed does not make them more or less valuable, what about a signed double trouble card ??????????
signatures CERTAINLY DO NOT dictate price of a card,
like said before, not everyone here is trying to scam (met some very nicew people, helpfull),,, but the ratio of good to bad offers so far has been even...
if youve got nothing useful to say in this thread then please dont reply, we are asking where do people get the nerve to offer such crap offers for 09 Classic (limited print release) ?? and at what point is a fair trade ??... i personally think if your wanting to trade with 09 Classics , you gotta trade by "ratio" at the minimum...otherwise, simply sell it...
this thread isnt about what card looks better amd what you personally like collecting more...
duhh...
Sorry Gould i have to disagree with you there.
Just because top prospects are signed does not make them more or less valuable, what about a signed double trouble card ??????????
signatures CERTAINLY DO NOT dictate price of a card, maybe in other series like basketball where you come across Rare Micheal Jordan Auto cards or something, but even in those series those cards are mostly limited to 30 - 40 oif that same card.
Thats what makes em so valuable THE LIMITED NUMBER OF THE 1 CARD.
In saying that, there are only 200 Double Troubles made of the one team, which might not be much to you, but it is still 100 less then what is printed in The Top Prospect cards.
i think its fair to say that pack ratio of the card is the best bet on grabbing a starting selling price for the card.
Well look at the Captains Sig Redemption Cards for Example 1:576 packs or something.
And i haven't seen one go for any less then 600 Dollers, EVEN ANDREW RYAN!!! eeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
So its blatantly obvious that Ratio is Dictating the prices of Cap sig Redemptions !
So why not Double Troubles???
Hand Signed Inserts devalue the card most of the time and really are only valued by the person who got it signed, Top Prospects and Future Force Cards are certified and collectors never have to worry about authenticity.
Double Troubles are rubbish, all previous Select Series 2 Releases that have a 1:2 Box inserts are way better. Example- 2005 Power Inspirations (Ebay Auction going rate $65-$75) 2006 Invincible Legend Die-Cut ($60-$120) 2008 Centenary Immortal Sketch<< Im not a big fan ($45-$70).
There is no way that when prices settle down Double Troubles will be worth over $50.
They look lame and i really think they only appeal to a younger collector.
Think about some of the 90s inserts that were 1:2 Boxes, some struggle to even get $10. Now i know that 90s were way overproduced, but im just proving my point that Ratio means nothing.
So on your whole "Ratio is key theory", 4x Team of the Year Cards are worth 1 Double Trouble and 2xTY for a Top Prospect?.............I dont think so.
---------- Post added at 12:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:53 AM ----------
I really think Selct has stuffed up big time and neglected the collector who only collects Series 2. The 1:2 Box insert shouldve been Platinum Top Prospects #/100.
That is one of Selects best ideas ever, AFL platinums (2005 Dynasty and 2008 Classic) go for $100+, there are no NRL Inserts of the same ratio that reach those prices.
I have 2 DTs (Knights and Bulldogs) that i would be more than willing to trade for 4 Top Prospects. I guess that kind of trade is really upto the individual but i am really suprised how many people really like DTs.
but as for the rest, i think alot of you just are failing to realise the following:
09 NRL Classic is a "Limited" print series, limited means a certain amount printed right ?
so therefor, yes mate 4 TOTY is a fair trade for a DT.
its simple, you cant trade and sell cards at the same time....
its either trade it or sell it, not both...
being as 09 NRL Classic is a "Limited" print, TRADING must go by ratio, its just common sense...
So many things come into the price a card will sell for, things like the team featured, the player featured, the design of the card, if it's signed, whether it has the number printed on it or not, condition, demand for the card, even what the seller charges for postage!
If all of those things were equal, then yes, the value and price of the card would solely depend on how many were printed. But the variables I've mentioned above are pretty huge, you'll never see card prices solely dependant on print run alone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?