im not complaining..
i put a small amount on iggy at 13:1 to get the MVP
If the Cavs lose these Finals, LeBron James should still become the second player to be acclaimed even in losing. LeBron James finished Game 5 with 40 points, 14 rebounds and 11 assists, his second triple-double in five Finals games this postseason, even in a losing effort for the Cavs. No player in this series has meant as much to his team, night after night, play after play, as LeBron James has meant to the Cavaliers, even in a losing effort. Even if Golden State wins this series, LeBron James has been the most valuable player
Unfortunately, if they're going to award the Finals MVP for these reasons, Westbrook should've won the regular season MVP. It's not all about putting up stats.
Hey all, just like to seek some thoughts on the Finals MVP decision...
I'm shaking my head in comparing Lebrons series to Iggy -
Lebron per game - 36 points / 13 rebounds / 9 assists
Iggy per game - 16 points / 6 rebounds / 4 assists
Curry per game - 26 points / 5 rebounds / 6 assists
Yes GSW won but I'm a bit jaded that one of the greatest finals performances in league history went ignored.
Thats NBA Jam averages right there! Is it anti-Lebron media? How did Curry not even get a vote?
This from NBA.com - Only once in the history of the NBA has the NBA Finals MVP come from the team that lost the NBA Finals (Jerry West in 1969). If the Cavs lose these Finals, LeBron James should still become the second player to be acclaimed even in losing. LeBron James finished Game 5 with 40 points, 14 rebounds and 11 assists, his second triple-double in five Finals games this postseason, even in a losing effort for the Cavs. No player in this series has meant as much to his team, night after night, play after play, as LeBron James has meant to the Cavaliers, even in a losing effort. Even if Golden State wins this series, LeBron James has been the most valuable player.
You have gone mad!I think iggy's impact was a noticeable impact,
More noticeable than lbj's efforts.
I disagree. I don't think Westbrook should have even been top 3. He played lights out and had some monster stats, but what impact did he have first half of the season?
I think that had to do with adjusting to having/not-having KD. Once Westbrook got in the swing of things, he was playing exactly how Lebron did in this series; toying with triple doubles, and shooting just about everything.
In my Opinion Iggy was the Most Valuable Player in the Finals at least for GSW and he deserved it. Without Iggy I don't know if they would have won, he really played some great Defense, hell lebron probably would have averaged a triple double with 40+ points, maybe 50 if he didn't play and it was his big game 4 that started the three game streak to win it and come back from 2-1.
LBJ did play amazing but put up a hell of a lot of shots, some people had a go at Westbrook for the amount of shots he put up over his crazy run in the last half of the season.
Iggy had some nice games but golden state would have won without him.... Curry on the other hand... If Lebron doesn't deserve MVP of the finals steph curry would have been the obvious choice
How can you simply say Warriors would have won without Iggy??Iggy had some nice games but golden state would have won without him.... Curry on the other hand... If Lebron doesn't deserve MVP of the finals steph curry would have been the obvious choice
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?