Richo said:Good comments Marty & Locky but my point is that even if the umpire was wrong it doesn't mean you protest against the decision by not returning to the field !!! He (the umpire) would have been disciplined by the umpires pannel (If wrong).....next teams will refuse to return becasue they don't agree with the "out" decisions.......Oh that's right - Sri Lanka have already done that !!!
But ICC chief executive Malcolm Speed said Pakistan could face further charges after refusing to take to the field in London.
"The umpires are meeting this morning to consider whether there should be any further charges in relation to the refusal by Pakistan to take the field that resulted in the forfeit of the match," Speed told BBC Radio.
"It may be that there is more than one charge."
The forfeit, which rescued the home country from a difficult match position, cost England cricket authorities around $A1 million in refunds and lost ticket sales.
ljandkg said:I'm 50/50 on this but the way Hair carries himself - it doesn't surprise me - The thing that gets my goat was when the Pakis had gotten over their little dummy spit and came back out Hair and the jr umpire refused to restart the game - now THAT is ridiculous - for the sake of the 20000 or how many were there to not go back out once the pakis had gone out shows u how important Hair thinks he is - for the sake of the spectators the umps shoulda just restarted the game and then sorted out discipline when the pakis had won....
mattyj said:i 100% agree with you Richo (first time for everything ) - They deserved the forfeit, it was an absolute disgrace they didnt return, they were acting like spoilt children... "he said i did this so im not playing" what a joke...if u dont like the umpires decision then protest properly, lodge a complaint withthe match referee, dont act like a bunch of spoilt brat children
Inzamum should be suspended and stripped of his captaincy