J Jdon8 OzCardTrader Feedback - 0% 0 0 0 Monday at 5:57 PM #1 Hi, Quick question, I have the Gold Parallel Cameron Munster numbered #1 of 90. Is that normally more valuable because it's the first one off the rank? Thanks
Hi, Quick question, I have the Gold Parallel Cameron Munster numbered #1 of 90. Is that normally more valuable because it's the first one off the rank? Thanks
ElijahCraigHyde OzCardTrader Feedback - 100% 105 0 0 Monday at 7:13 PM #2 In the eyes of some collectors it is however not necessarily the case for Master set collectors- in other words if I needed that card to build a complete set, I wouldn't be prepared to pay a premium for the number 1
In the eyes of some collectors it is however not necessarily the case for Master set collectors- in other words if I needed that card to build a complete set, I wouldn't be prepared to pay a premium for the number 1