Brent Harvey Decision - Agree/Disagree?
- Thread starter Billyhoyle
- Start date
the tribunal decision itself - i dislike. going by the rules his week off should have stayed. maybe they should change the fyfe decision to so he has a chance at the brownlow as harvey bump was worse than his.
but i feel that it was just a bump and never reported.
north supporters should be very thankful for the super selwoods testimony.
the umpires/mrp decision to give him a week for a bump should never have come up.
also get rid of this points system and every incident should just be on that incident.
once the afl realise that accidents happen, it will bring the game back to its very best as the players will know where they stand.
but i feel that it was just a bump and never reported.
north supporters should be very thankful for the super selwoods testimony.
the umpires/mrp decision to give him a week for a bump should never have come up.
also get rid of this points system and every incident should just be on that incident.
once the afl realise that accidents happen, it will bring the game back to its very best as the players will know where they stand.
Similar threads
