What happens with banned members, and the feedback they've left?
If they leave a negative feedback, and they are perm. banned, should the feedback be reviewed?
I mean, say they leave a bad feedback, bad as in off topic, or blatantly lied, etc, Admin could possibly review it if that member becomes perm. banned.
I won't give an example I just saw, but just putting it out there to see what Admin think.
Banned members feedback stands as its still a deal. If the neg is not warranted then it should of been dealt with when they were a member etc. You shouldn't wait till they are banned to take such actions or ask such things as it doesn't effect anything.
Posting and trading are two separate things as proven in the past by problem members and rarely do they do both wrong.
IF the feedback is blatantly wrong we will change it but the banning of the member doesn't make it any different.
Almost on topic...what about "post-ban" feedback for members still on the board? Is there some way of admins giving positive feedback to members who have done the right thing in trades/sales with banned members?
YEah I don't see why not. A good member shouldn't have to suffer because of a bad member. I'll look into it as I can change feeback but will check out if I can actually add feedback for a member. There would need to be a submit trade agreement thread I'd think as well.
YEah I don't see why not. A good member shouldn't have to suffer because of a bad member. I'll look into it as I can change feeback but will check out if I can actually add feedback for a member. There would need to be a submit trade agreement thread I'd think as well.
Oh yeah, of course only for cases where there is an existing submit trade thread, and not in cases where it is more than likely a trade problem would have caused neutral or negative feedback. Good work ozcardtrader admin!
LOL just created more work for me! One or two feedback score really isn't too important though when its a trusted member but if some members think its warranted.
I agree that it isn't that important, it would just diminish the bummed out feeling that good traders/forumites who deal with sound traders but questionable posters get when one party is banned. It would also help those who like to go for record numbers!
Banned members feedback stands as its still a deal. If the neg is not warranted then it should of been dealt with when they were a member etc. You shouldn't wait till they are banned to take such actions or ask such things as it doesn't effect anything.
Posting and trading are two separate things as proven in the past by problem members and rarely do they do both wrong.
IF the feedback is blatantly wrong we will change it but the banning of the member doesn't make it any different.
I have noticed a couple of times lately that members are tying to make deals with banned members. Myself being one of them. I think it may help, rather than just having Banned under their User Name to have a BANNED Avitar or something like it to make it easy to see.
Just a thought.
What happens with banned members, and the feedback they've left?
If they leave a negative feedback, and they are perm. banned, should the feedback be reviewed?
I mean, say they leave a bad feedback, bad as in off topic, or blatantly lied, etc, Admin could possibly review it if that member becomes perm. banned.
I won't give an example I just saw, but just putting it out there to see what Admin think.
His post was from 2007, so not much point - your point is valid though.
and a good reminder to everyone if you know it is a banned member please report the thread or PM to the mods. We ban people all the time for the good of the site and the safety of all members, so ultimately it's in your best interests to keep them off the site.
His post was from 2007, so not much point - your point is valid though.
and a good reminder to everyone if you know it is a banned member please report the thread or PM to the mods. We ban people all the time for the good of the site and the safety of all members, so ultimately it's in your best interests to keep them off the site.