is bloody rich coming from the king of negative football. He doesn't coach to win, he coaches to not lose, he's like a point fighter in MMA, doing just enough to get the judges scores in his favour but never looking for the knockout. The problems with Fremantle's attack start with him.with Ross Lyon admitting last night that his team needs to be more attacking.
Hodge is a hardnut and a champion of the game.Hodge deserved the elbow he is a dirty player
Hodge deserved the elbow he is a dirty player
Not a freo supporter I just don't like the way hodge playsMust be a Freo feral, stay mad son.
Not a freo supporter I just don't like the way hodge plays
As a Hawks supporter I love the way he plays. He's not perfect, no AFL player is. But his hard uncompromising style of play and leadership will go down in history as one of the greatest. I take the good with the bad with Hodgey and wouldn't change a thing. His record in big games speaks for itself.
It should be a very good count! I have done my own count, awarding votes in every game and I ended up with Fyfe on 29 votes and Priddis and Gaff each on 27. Obviously I'm really hoping one of those two can win it, but there is something going against each:Do we think that Nathan Fyfe is a straightforward winner of the Brownlow medal tonight, or can Matt Priddis, Sam Mitchell, Patrick Dangerfield or Todd Goldstein win it instead?
The West Coast fans on here would know much more about this than me, but trawling through the AFL statistics yesterday I noticed that in quite a few games young Andrew Gaff had more possessions than Matt Priddis and of course he is a more frequent goal kicker. It might be similar to a Swan/Pendlebury thing at Collingwood, taking votes from each other.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?