This from NBA.com -
Only once in the history of the NBA has the NBA Finals MVP come from the team that lost the NBA Finals (Jerry West in 1969). If the Cavs lose these Finals, LeBron James should still become the second player to be acclaimed even in losing. LeBron James finished Game 5 with 40 points, 14 rebounds and 11 assists, his second triple-double in five Finals games this postseason, even in a losing effort for the Cavs. No player in this series has meant as much to his team, night after night, play after play, as LeBron James has meant to the Cavaliers, even in a losing effort. Even if Golden State wins this series, LeBron James has been the most valuable player.
If shutting down Lebron meansBut you could see that Iggy may be the MVP, because if he was not the one to play LeBron, The Warriors may not have won the trophy. So in effect he was able, to some extent limit and shut down LeBron, and therefore a better MVP than The King.
Yes, he had no support, there is no doubt about that. That is why they could not get the ring. But being the only good player on the team and doing all the work, does not necessarily mean you are the MVP.
Maybe the Cavs may still not have won without Iggy to play LeBron. And that was where it may have been heading anyway without the Warrior's lineup change. But we will never know. And from what could be seen, Iggy got inserted, turned the tables on a storming LeBron, and they ended up winning 3 in a row to secure the Title.
Can the coach be the MVP for taking the chance with the lineup change?
Who I feel bad for is Bogut, as he was taken off..........makes it look as though he was a problem in the Warrior's losses early in the Finals series.
if shutting down Lebron is 35.8 points, 13.3 rebounds and 8.8 assists per game. then if hate to see him not stoping him, also if you can have a porformance like that and not win mvp then it go's to show that they need a change in how the finals MVP is awarded, because theirs no way over 6 games Iggy was better than jamesBut you could see that Iggy may be the MVP, because if he was not the one to play LeBron, The Warriors may not have won the trophy. So in effect he was able, to some extent limit and shut down LeBron, and therefore a better MVP than The King.
Yes, he had no support, there is no doubt about that. That is why they could not get the ring. But being the only good player on the team and doing all the work, does not necessarily mean you are the MVP.
Maybe the Cavs may still not have won without Iggy to play LeBron. And that was where it may have been heading anyway without the Warrior's lineup change. But we will never know. And from what could be seen, Iggy got inserted, turned the tables on a storming LeBron, and they ended up winning 3 in a row to secure the Title.
Can the coach be the MVP for taking the chance with the lineup change?
Who I feel bad for is Bogut, as he was taken off..........makes it look as though he was a problem in the Warrior's losses early in the Finals series.
If shutting down Lebron means
if shutting down Lebron is 35.8 points, 13.3 rebounds and 8.8 assists per game. then if hate to see him not stoping him, also if you can have a porformance like that and not win mvp then it go's to show that they need a change in how the finals MVP is awarded, because theirs no way over 6 games Iggy was better than james
I think that to a certain extent, there exists an understanding that the title of MVP should also bring with it the pre-requisite of winning games. We see this constantly in the regular season and indeed in the NBA Finals. Russell Westbrook, despite putting up near triple doubles on a seemingly nightly basis, would have been a very unlikely winner of league MVP as his team failed to make the playoffs. He was clearly the sole reason that they were even close to making the playoffs and arguably had the best stats in the league. I just don't get awarding it to someone on the losing team. If LeBron got swept but averaged 50, 10 and 10, are you really going to give it to him? It makes no sense. I also don't get how Steph ends up with no votes. Who the hell are these 11 voters? Steph had one horrible game, and maybe 3 quarters of another game, but was in my opinion, the more deserving winner over Iggy. It will be somewhat interesting to see what Kerr does next season with the starting lineup. Surely you can't bring the Finals MVP off the bench? And surely David Lee will play a larger role?
2 years in a row where Lebron's team was beated in the Finals. I where he didn't have enough help and one where his team got decimated.
But the worst part for Lebron?
In both instances, the finals MVP was Lebron's direct opponent!
OUCH!!
That's a bit of a stretch.... Iggy's direct opponent put up a monster stat line through out the series. On the offensive end he was stroking elbow jumpers with Mosgov lagging off him. Hardly a direct comparison.
In saying that a great series to watch. I hadn't watched much of Golden State through the year and the first couple of games I was wondering why they had the record they did. At the end of the finals series I could see why! No weak links in that team and some of those 3 balls of Stephs were crazy.
Bring on next season and hopefully the loss means I can still add some nice cards to the PC at a reasonable price! Gotta find a positive haha
The most valuable player is the one that can stop lebron which is what iggy did. The time Iggy guarded lebron he went 18 from 54 shots shooting 33%.
Of contested shots lebron went 11 of 46 22%. And don't forget playing 46 min a game with 40 FG attempts, and the only scorer on the team dropping 30+ a game is a given
ESPN reporting that Lee not likely to return next season as they feel it would be unfair to him to keep him in a diminished role. Whoever gets Lee will be getting a 18 and 8 type production if he gets minutes.
You totally missed the point. The time iggy was guarding him he shot 33%. Would you classify making the best player shoot 33% not MVP quality basketball?Stopped Lebron, he averaged 35/13/8, if thats stopping I'd hate to see him going off
Not when he still averaged 35, plus 14 rebounds, and 8 assists, more than one way to help a team, he would of averaged 15 assists if anyone of his team could hit a shotYou totally missed the point. The time iggy was guarding him he shot 33%. Would you classify making the best player shoot 33% not MVP quality basketball?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?